Logging · head to head
Bugsnag vs Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bugsnag owned by SmartBear rather than being independent; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Bugsnag covers Error tracking, Loki covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bugsnag and Loki actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bugsnag
- Error tracking
- Crash reporting
- Release tracking
- Trend analysis
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bugsnag
- Crash and error reporting for mobile and web applicationsnot Loki
- Stability scores per releasenot Loki
- Grouping errors by root cause across deploysnot Loki
- Alerting when a release regressesnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Bugsnag
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Bugsnag
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bugsnag
- Owned by SmartBear rather than being independent
- The free tier covers 7,500 events a month
- Paid tiers are usage-priced by event volume rather than by seat, so a noisy release raises the bill
- Enterprise pricing is quote-only
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Bugsnag
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- Error and performance monitoring
- 7500 events monthly
- SelectFree
- 50000-3 million error monitoring events monthly tiered
- 1-150 million performance monitoring spans
- Unlimited users
- PreferredFree
- 100000-3 million error monitoring events tiered
- 1-300 million performance monitoring spans
- Automatic error prioritization
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom pricing
- All Preferred features plus
- Automatic error assignment
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Bugsnag if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want crash reporting.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Bugsnag or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bugsnag starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bugsnag or Loki?
- Bugsnag starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does Bugsnag or Loki run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Bugsnag for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bugsnag best used for?
- Bugsnag is most often used for crash and error reporting for mobile and web applications, stability scores per release, grouping errors by root cause across deploys, alerting when a release regresses. Of those, crash and error reporting for mobile and web applications and stability scores per release are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Bugsnag do that Loki cannot?
- Bugsnag covers Error tracking, Crash reporting, Release tracking, Trend analysis. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bugsnag: Is BugSnag free?
BugSnag Free plan is free and includes 1 user, error and performance monitoring with 7500 events and 1 million spans monthly, 50+ platforms, 30+ integrations, and 7-day data retention for solo developers and passion projects.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceBugsnag: What are the event and span limits by BugSnag plan?
Free plan: 7500 error events and 1 million spans monthly. Select plan: 50000-3 million error events and 1-150 million spans tiered. Preferred plan: 100000-3 million error events and 1-300 million spans tiered. Enterprise plan: custom limits with pricing on request.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceBugsnag: How long does BugSnag retain error data?
BugSnag Free plan retains data for 7 days. Select and Preferred paid plans retain error data for 60 days. Enterprise plans offer custom data retention periods negotiated with sales.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceBugsnag: What features does BugSnag Preferred plan add?
BugSnag Preferred plan (pricing tiered by volume, not published) adds automatic error prioritization, stability benchmarks, advanced segmentation, custom notifications, SAML SSO, and system metrics monitoring compared to Select plan.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Bugsnag vs Elastic Stack
- Bugsnag vs New Relic
- Bugsnag vs Datadog Logs
- Bugsnag vs Coralogix
- Bugsnag vs Healthchecks
- Bugsnag vs Dynatrace
- Bugsnag vs AppDynamics
- Bugsnag vs Retrace
- Bugsnag vs Grafana Loki
- Bugsnag vs incident.io
- Bugsnag vs Cronitor
- Bugsnag vs Checkly
- Bugsnag vs CloudWatch
- Bugsnag vs Airbrake
- Bugsnag vs Axiom
- Bugsnag vs Elastic APM
- Bugsnag vs Dynatrace Logs
- Bugsnag vs Graylog
- Bugsnag vs Loggly
- Bugsnag vs Mezmo
- Bugsnag vs Logz.io
- Bugsnag vs Papertrail
- Bugsnag vs Raygun
- Bugsnag vs New Relic Logs
- Bugsnag vs Filebeat
- Bugsnag vs Logstash
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Healthchecks
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs incident.io
- Loki vs Cronitor
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash


