Log Management · head to head
Bugsnag vs Raygun
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bugsnag owned by SmartBear rather than being independent; Raygun crash Reporting error data is retained for 180 days and Real User Monitoring sessions for only 60 days; longer retention is Enterprise only
- They diverge on capability: Bugsnag covers Error tracking, Raygun covers Real user monitoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bugsnag and Raygun actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bugsnag
- Error tracking
- Release tracking
- Trend analysis
Only in Raygun
- Real user monitoring
- Performance tracking
- Source maps
Both cover
- Crash reporting
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bugsnag
- Crash and error reporting for mobile and web applicationsnot Raygun
- Stability scores per releasenot Raygun
- Grouping errors by root cause across deploysnot Raygun
- Alerting when a release regressesnot Raygun
Raygun
- Crash and error reporting for web, mobile and backend applicationsnot Bugsnag
- Real user monitoring of front end page load and session performancenot Bugsnag
- Application performance monitoring with request level tracesnot Bugsnag
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bugsnag
- Owned by SmartBear rather than being independent
- The free tier covers 7,500 events a month
- Paid tiers are usage-priced by event volume rather than by seat, so a noisy release raises the bill
- Enterprise pricing is quote-only
Raygun
- Crash Reporting error data is retained for 180 days and Real User Monitoring sessions for only 60 days; longer retention is Enterprise only
- Crash Reporting, Real User Monitoring and APM are billed as three separate products, each metered on its own unit of errors, sessions or traces
- A Real User Monitoring session ends after 30 minutes of inactivity, so a single visit spanning breaks is billed as several sessions
- Usage beyond the plan allowance is billed on demand at $0.001 per error and $0.002 per session or trace
- Enterprise plan pricing is custom with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Bugsnag
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Crash reporting
- Release tracking
Raygun
Free- FreeFree
- Crash reporting
- Real user monitoring
- Performance tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose Bugsnag if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want release tracking.
Choose Raygun if
- You need real user monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want performance tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Bugsnag or Raygun better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bugsnag starts at Free and Raygun at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bugsnag or Raygun?
- Bugsnag starts at Free and Raygun at Free.
- Does Bugsnag or Raygun run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Bugsnag for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bugsnag best used for?
- Bugsnag is most often used for crash and error reporting for mobile and web applications, stability scores per release, grouping errors by root cause across deploys, alerting when a release regresses. Of those, crash and error reporting for mobile and web applications and stability scores per release are not what Raygun is typically brought in for.
- What can Bugsnag do that Raygun cannot?
- Bugsnag covers Error tracking, Release tracking, Trend analysis. Raygun covers Real user monitoring, Performance tracking, Source maps. Both handle Crash reporting, API, Webhooks, REST.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bugsnag vs Elastic Stack
- Bugsnag vs New Relic
- Bugsnag vs Datadog Logs
- Bugsnag vs Coralogix
- Bugsnag vs Grafana Loki
- Bugsnag vs CloudWatch
- Bugsnag vs Dynatrace
- Bugsnag vs InfluxDB
- Bugsnag vs Airbrake
- Bugsnag vs AppDynamics
- Bugsnag vs Axiom
- Bugsnag vs Azure Monitor
- Bugsnag vs Better Stack
- Bugsnag vs Dynatrace Logs
- Bugsnag vs Elastic
- Bugsnag vs Elastic APM
- Bugsnag vs Elasticsearch Service
- Bugsnag vs ELK Stack
- Raygun vs Elastic Stack
- Raygun vs New Relic
- Raygun vs Datadog Logs
- Raygun vs Coralogix
- Raygun vs Grafana Loki
- Raygun vs CloudWatch
- Raygun vs Dynatrace
- Raygun vs InfluxDB
- Raygun vs Airbrake
- Raygun vs AppDynamics
- Raygun vs Axiom
- Raygun vs Azure Monitor
- Raygun vs Better Stack
- Raygun vs Dynatrace Logs
- Raygun vs Elastic
- Raygun vs Elastic APM
- Raygun vs Elasticsearch Service
- Raygun vs ELK Stack


