Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Okta

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Okta
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Okta
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Authelia
- Customer identitynot Authelia
- B2B integrationnot Authelia
- Zero Trust securitynot Authelia
- Compliancenot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Okta?
- Authelia starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Authelia or Okta run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Okta cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Okta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Okta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Dashlane
- Authelia vs Aha!
- Authelia vs Eclipse
- Authelia vs Datadog
- Authelia vs Greenhouse
- Authelia vs GitLab
- Authelia vs Postgres
- Authelia vs RescueTime
- Authelia vs Asana
- Authelia vs Amplitude
- Authelia vs Intercom
- Authelia vs LaunchDarkly
- Authelia vs Finxact
- Authelia vs GitHub
- Authelia vs Heap
- Authelia vs Microsoft Edge
- Authelia vs Netlify
- Authelia vs Productboard
- Okta vs authentik
- Okta vs Logto
- Okta vs Ory Kratos
- Okta vs Frontegg
- Okta vs Infisical
- Okta vs Bitwarden
- Okta vs Semgrep
- Okta vs Trivy
- Okta vs Chainguard
- Okta vs Passbolt
- Okta vs 1Password
- Okta vs Signicat
- Okta vs Silent Eight
- Okta vs Socket
- Okta vs Socure
- Okta vs SonicWall
- Okta vs Sophos Intercept X
- Okta vs Ory
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Eclipse
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs GitLab
- Okta vs Postgres
- Okta vs RescueTime
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs LaunchDarkly
- Okta vs Finxact
- Okta vs GitHub
- Okta vs Heap
- Okta vs Microsoft Edge
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Productboard

