Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs GitHub

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; GitHub acquired by Microsoft in 2018, reducing pure independence despite operational autonomy
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, GitHub covers Git repositories.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and GitHub actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in GitHub
- Git repositories
- Pull requests
- Code review
- Issues & projects
- GitHub Actions CI/CD
- GitHub Pages
- Security scanning
- Dependency management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot GitHub
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot GitHub
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot GitHub
GitHub
- Version controlnot authentik
- Code collaborationnot authentik
- CI/CD pipelinesnot authentik
- Project managementnot authentik
- Documentation hostingnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
GitHub
- Acquired by Microsoft in 2018, reducing pure independence despite operational autonomy
- Primary focus on source control differs from purpose-built project management tools like Jira
- Pricing for enterprise features and private repositories adds up compared to some self-hosted alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
GitHub
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited public/private repos
- 2,000 CI/CD minutes/month
- 500MB package storage
- Team$4/month
- Everything in Free
- 3,000 CI/CD minutes/month
- 2GB package storage
- Enterprise$21/month
- Everything in Team
- 50,000 CI/CD minutes/month
- 50GB package storage
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose GitHub if
- You need git repositories.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want pull requests.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or GitHub better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and GitHub at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or GitHub?
- authentik starts at Free and GitHub at Free.
- Does authentik or GitHub run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. GitHub runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what GitHub is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that GitHub cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. GitHub covers Git repositories, Pull requests, Code review, Issues & projects.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
GitHub: What is a Git repository and how does GitHub use it?
A repository is the centralized database that stores the complete collection of files and folders for a codebase, along with the revision history. GitHub uses Git to provide distributed version control access to repositories with version tracking, branching, and collaboration features.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
GitHub: How does GitHub authentication work?
When you connect to a GitHub repository from Git, you need to authenticate with GitHub using either HTTPS or SSH. GitHub supports multiple authentication methods including passwords, personal access tokens, SSH keys, and GitHub Apps.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
GitHub: How long has GitHub been operating?
GitHub was founded in 2008 and launched publicly on April 10, 2008, making it the dominant git hosting platform for nearly two decades.
SourceGitHub: Who owns GitHub and when did the acquisition occur?
Microsoft acquired GitHub for $7.5 billion USD, with the deal announced June 4, 2018 and completed October 26, 2018. GitHub operates as an independent subsidiary within Microsoft.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Eclipse
- authentik vs GitLab
- authentik vs Jira
- authentik vs Docker
- authentik vs Linear
- authentik vs Kubernetes
- authentik vs Jenkins
- authentik vs Postman
- authentik vs Storybook
- authentik vs Asana
- authentik vs PostHog
- authentik vs Plane
- authentik vs WebStorm
- authentik vs Zabbix Cloud
- authentik vs Intercom
- authentik vs LaunchDarkly
- authentik vs Mixpanel
- GitHub vs Authelia
- GitHub vs Logto
- GitHub vs Ory
- GitHub vs Passbolt
- GitHub vs Clerk
- GitHub vs 1Password
- GitHub vs Frontegg
- GitHub vs OWASP ZAP
- GitHub vs Infisical
- GitHub vs Chainguard
- GitHub vs Bitwarden
- GitHub vs Cosign
- GitHub vs CyberGhost VPN
- GitHub vs Dahua Technology
- GitHub vs Descope
- GitHub vs Drata
- GitHub vs DTiQ
- GitHub vs Ory Kratos
- GitHub vs Eclipse
- GitHub vs GitLab
- GitHub vs Jira
- GitHub vs Docker
- GitHub vs Linear
- GitHub vs Kubernetes
- GitHub vs Jenkins
- GitHub vs Postman
- GitHub vs Storybook
- GitHub vs Asana
- GitHub vs PostHog
- GitHub vs Plane
- GitHub vs WebStorm
- GitHub vs Zabbix Cloud
- GitHub vs Intercom
- GitHub vs LaunchDarkly
- GitHub vs Mixpanel

