Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Greenhouse

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Greenhouse actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, Ios, Android, Api |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Technology |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Greenhouse
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Greenhouse
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Greenhouse
Greenhouse
- Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot authentik
- Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot authentik
- Structured interview process managementnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Greenhouse better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Greenhouse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Greenhouse?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for Greenhouse.
- Does authentik or Greenhouse run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Greenhouse is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Greenhouse cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Greenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Greenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?
Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Greenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?
No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Asana
- authentik vs ClickUp
- authentik vs Linear
- authentik vs Figma
- authentik vs Kubernetes
- authentik vs Notion
- authentik vs Datadog
- authentik vs Monday.com
- authentik vs Terraform
- authentik vs Docker
- authentik vs Google Chrome
- authentik vs Intercom
- authentik vs Mozilla Firefox
- authentik vs Okta
- authentik vs PostHog
- authentik vs Redis
- authentik vs Supabase
- authentik vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs 1Password
- Greenhouse vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Greenhouse vs Norton 360
- Greenhouse vs LastPass
- Greenhouse vs Snyk
- Greenhouse vs Bitwarden
- Greenhouse vs Brave Browser
- Greenhouse vs Clerk
- Greenhouse vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Greenhouse vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Greenhouse vs Mullvad VPN
- Greenhouse vs OneTrust
- Greenhouse vs Private Internet Access
- Greenhouse vs Proton Mail
- Greenhouse vs Tuta
- Greenhouse vs Akeyless
- Greenhouse vs Doppler
- Greenhouse vs Frontegg
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Kubernetes
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Terraform
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Google Chrome
- Greenhouse vs Intercom
- Greenhouse vs Mozilla Firefox
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs Redis
- Greenhouse vs Supabase
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude

