Cybersecurity · head to head
Infisical vs Okta

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Infisical covers Secrets management, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infisical and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Okta
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Okta
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Okta
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Infisical
- Customer identitynot Infisical
- B2B integrationnot Infisical
- Zero Trust securitynot Infisical
- Compliancenot Infisical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Infisical or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infisical starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infisical or Okta?
- Infisical starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Infisical or Okta run on more platforms?
- Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Infisical for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Infisical best used for?
- Infisical is most often used for managing secrets across kubernetes clusters, automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki, providing privileged database access with audit trails, securing credentials for ai agents at runtime. Of those, managing secrets across kubernetes clusters and automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Infisical do that Okta cannot?
- Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourceOkta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceInfisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceInfisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Infisical vs 1Password
- Infisical vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Infisical vs Norton 360
- Infisical vs LastPass
- Infisical vs Snyk
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Brave Browser
- Infisical vs Clerk
- Infisical vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Infisical vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Infisical vs Mullvad VPN
- Infisical vs OneTrust
- Infisical vs Private Internet Access
- Infisical vs Proton Mail
- Infisical vs Tuta
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs Frontegg
- Infisical vs Asana
- Infisical vs ClickUp
- Infisical vs Linear
- Infisical vs Figma
- Infisical vs Kubernetes
- Infisical vs Notion
- Infisical vs Datadog
- Infisical vs Monday.com
- Infisical vs Terraform
- Infisical vs Docker
- Infisical vs Greenhouse
- Infisical vs Google Chrome
- Infisical vs Intercom
- Infisical vs Mozilla Firefox
- Infisical vs PostHog
- Infisical vs Redis
- Infisical vs Supabase
- Infisical vs Amplitude
- Okta vs 1Password
- Okta vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Okta vs Norton 360
- Okta vs LastPass
- Okta vs Snyk
- Okta vs Bitwarden
- Okta vs Brave Browser
- Okta vs Clerk
- Okta vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Okta vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Okta vs Mullvad VPN
- Okta vs OneTrust
- Okta vs Private Internet Access
- Okta vs Proton Mail
- Okta vs Tuta
- Okta vs Akeyless
- Okta vs Doppler
- Okta vs Frontegg
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Kubernetes
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Terraform
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Google Chrome
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs Redis
- Okta vs Supabase
- Okta vs Amplitude

