Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Fig

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that authentik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Fig
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Fig
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Fig?
- authentik starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does authentik or Fig run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Fig runs on Web.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Fig cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Visual Studio Code
- authentik vs ESLint
- authentik vs Turborepo
- authentik vs pnpm
- authentik vs Sweep
- authentik vs Cody
- authentik vs Warp
- authentik vs Keycloak
- authentik vs Rust
- authentik vs CodeSandbox
- authentik vs Vite
- authentik vs Daytona
- authentik vs Visual Studio
- authentik vs Xlinesoft
- authentik vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- authentik vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Authelia
- Fig vs Logto
- Fig vs Ory
- Fig vs Passbolt
- Fig vs Clerk
- Fig vs 1Password
- Fig vs Frontegg
- Fig vs OWASP ZAP
- Fig vs Infisical
- Fig vs Chainguard
- Fig vs Bitwarden
- Fig vs Cosign
- Fig vs CyberGhost VPN
- Fig vs Dahua Technology
- Fig vs Descope
- Fig vs Drata
- Fig vs DTiQ
- Fig vs Ory Kratos
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
