Cybersecurity · head to head
Cosign vs Fig
Cosign
Cybersecurity
Signs and verifies container images and artifacts, with or without managing keys
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cosign keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cosign and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cosign
- Keyless signing
- Key and KMS signing
- Registry-native storage
- In-toto attestations
- Offline verification
- Trusted root and signing config
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Cosign does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cosign
- Signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keysnot Fig
- Attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenancenot Fig
- Meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifactsnot Fig
- Verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registrynot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cosign
- Keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- A signature proves who signed, never whether they should have. The documentation is explicit that Sigstore cannot determine authorisation, so every consumer must write and maintain their own identity and issuer policy or verification means nothing.
- Nothing is enforced without an admission controller. Signing changes what you can prove, not what runs, and the official policy controller has a small maintainer base for a component sitting in a cluster admission path.
- Upgrades break pipelines. Version 3 changed defaults, version 4 is announced as removing legacy functionality and roughly half the command line flags, and two official client libraries still lacked support for the new log format as of mid 2026.
- Signatures do not expire. An artifact signed before a maintainer account was compromised and one signed after are indistinguishable unless somebody is actively monitoring the transparency log, and almost nobody is.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Cosign
Free- CosignFree
- Apache-2.0
- Public Sigstore infrastructure free to use
- No usage limits published
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cosign if
- You need keyless signing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want key and kms signing.
Questions people ask
- Is Cosign or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cosign starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cosign or Fig?
- Cosign starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Cosign or Fig run on more platforms?
- Cosign runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Fig runs on Web.
- Can I use Cosign for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cosign best used for?
- Cosign is most often used for signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keys, attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenance, meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifacts, verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registry. Of those, signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keys and attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenance are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can Cosign do that Fig cannot?
- Cosign covers Keyless signing, Key and KMS signing, Registry-native storage, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cosign: Does Cosign tell me if an image is vulnerable?
No. It has no vulnerability knowledge whatsoever. It can carry an SBOM as a signed attestation but never reads it. Pair it with a scanner.
Cosign: Is signing alone enough?
No. Verification is a command somebody runs. Without an admission controller enforcing it, an unsigned image still runs.
Cosign: What does a bare cosign verify actually prove?
Very little. Without a pinned certificate identity and OIDC issuer, it accepts a valid signature from any identity at all.
Cosign: What is the risk of keyless signing?
Your OIDC provider becomes the root of trust. Compromise of that account yields genuine, verifiable signatures, so account security is the control that matters.
Cosign: Should we expect breaking changes?
Yes. Version 4 is announced to remove roughly half the flags, and a post-quantum migration is named as a further breaking change after that.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cosign vs Sigstore
- Cosign vs Syft
- Cosign vs Chainguard
- Cosign vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cosign vs Infisical
- Cosign vs OWASP ZAP
- Cosign vs Wireshark
- Cosign vs Bitwarden
- Cosign vs Semgrep
- Cosign vs Trivy
- Cosign vs authentik
- Cosign vs Microsoft Intune
- Cosign vs Netwrix
- Cosign vs NordVPN
- Cosign vs Omada Identity
- Cosign vs Ory
- Cosign vs ProtonVPN
- Cosign vs Grype
- Cosign vs Visual Studio Code
- Cosign vs ESLint
- Cosign vs Turborepo
- Cosign vs pnpm
- Cosign vs Sweep
- Cosign vs Cody
- Cosign vs Warp
- Cosign vs Keycloak
- Cosign vs Rust
- Cosign vs CodeSandbox
- Cosign vs Vite
- Cosign vs Daytona
- Cosign vs Visual Studio
- Cosign vs Xlinesoft
- Cosign vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cosign vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Sigstore
- Fig vs Syft
- Fig vs Chainguard
- Fig vs HashiCorp Vault
- Fig vs Infisical
- Fig vs OWASP ZAP
- Fig vs Wireshark
- Fig vs Bitwarden
- Fig vs Semgrep
- Fig vs Trivy
- Fig vs authentik
- Fig vs Microsoft Intune
- Fig vs Netwrix
- Fig vs NordVPN
- Fig vs Omada Identity
- Fig vs Ory
- Fig vs ProtonVPN
- Fig vs Grype
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph