Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Fig
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Fig
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Fig
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Fig
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Fig?
- Cody starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Cody or Fig run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs Backstage
- Cody vs Bitbucket
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs Keycloak
- Cody vs Rust
- Cody vs CodeSandbox
- Cody vs Vite
- Cody vs Daytona
- Cody vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cody vs GNU Emacs
- Cody vs Keil MDK
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Deep Code
- Fig vs GitHub Copilot
- Fig vs Bazel
- Fig vs GoLand
- Fig vs Avo
- Fig vs Azure DevOps
- Fig vs Backstage
- Fig vs Bitbucket
- Fig vs Claude Code
- Fig vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Fig vs PhpStorm
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs GNU Emacs
- Fig vs Keil MDK

