Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Daytona

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Daytona
Developer Tools
Infrastructure for spinning up secure, sub-second sandboxes to run AI-generated code
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Daytona pricing is purely usage-based with no flat monthly plan, which can make costs harder to predict for steady workloads.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Daytona covers Sub-second sandbox creation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Daytona actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Daytona
- Sub-second sandbox creation
- Per-second billing
- GPU instances
- Windows OS support
- Enterprise BYOC
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Daytona
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Daytona
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Daytona
Daytona
- Running AI agent-generated code in a disposable, isolated sandboxnot authentik
- Executing untrusted user code for a coding platformnot authentik
- Running GPU workloads on demand without provisioning dedicated serversnot authentik
- Testing Windows-specific code paths in a sandboxnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Daytona
- Pricing is purely usage-based with no flat monthly plan, which can make costs harder to predict for steady workloads.
- GPU instances are priced separately and can be significantly more expensive than standard compute for AI-heavy use cases.
- Enterprise features like SSO, audit logs, and BYOC are only available by contacting sales rather than self-serve.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Daytona
Free- Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
- $0.0504 per vCPU/hour
- $0.0162 per GiB memory/hour
- $0.000108 per GiB storage/hour after 5 free GiB
- Startup Program$undefined/mo
- Up to $50,000 in free credits for qualifying startups
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom usage limits
- SSO
- Audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Daytona if
- You need sub-second sandbox creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, windows, api.
- You also want per-second billing.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Daytona better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Daytona at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Daytona?
- authentik starts at Free and Daytona at Free.
- Does authentik or Daytona run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Daytona runs on web, linux, windows, api.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Daytona is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Daytona cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Daytona covers Sub-second sandbox creation, Per-second billing, GPU instances, Windows OS support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Daytona: How is Daytona usage metered?
Usage is billed per second across vCPU, memory, and storage consumed, with separate per-hour rates for GPU and Windows instances.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Daytona: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
There is no flat free plan, but new signups receive $200 in free compute credit with no credit card required to start.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Daytona: Are discounts available for startups?
Yes, the Startup Program offers up to $50,000 in free credits for qualifying companies.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs CodeSandbox
- authentik vs Coder
- authentik vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- authentik vs Namespace
- authentik vs WarpBuild
- authentik vs Sweep
- authentik vs Turborepo
- authentik vs Keycloak
- authentik vs Vite
- authentik vs Depot
- authentik vs Harness
- authentik vs Swagger UI
- authentik vs Prettier
- authentik vs StackBlitz
- authentik vs Steampipe
- authentik vs Tilt
- authentik vs Webpack
- Daytona vs Authelia
- Daytona vs Logto
- Daytona vs Ory
- Daytona vs Passbolt
- Daytona vs Clerk
- Daytona vs 1Password
- Daytona vs Frontegg
- Daytona vs OWASP ZAP
- Daytona vs Infisical
- Daytona vs Chainguard
- Daytona vs Bitwarden
- Daytona vs Cosign
- Daytona vs CyberGhost VPN
- Daytona vs Dahua Technology
- Daytona vs Descope
- Daytona vs Drata
- Daytona vs DTiQ
- Daytona vs Ory Kratos
- Daytona vs CodeSandbox
- Daytona vs Coder
- Daytona vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Daytona vs Namespace
- Daytona vs WarpBuild
- Daytona vs Sweep
- Daytona vs Turborepo
- Daytona vs Keycloak
- Daytona vs Vite
- Daytona vs Depot
- Daytona vs Harness
- Daytona vs Swagger UI
- Daytona vs Prettier
- Daytona vs StackBlitz
- Daytona vs Steampipe
- Daytona vs Tilt
- Daytona vs Webpack
