Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Infisical
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Infisical actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Infisical does not also cover.
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Fig
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Fig
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Fig
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Which should you pick?
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Infisical better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Infisical at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Infisical?
- Fig starts at Free and Infisical at Free.
- Does Fig or Infisical run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Infisical cannot?
- Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourceInfisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourceInfisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Akeyless
- Fig vs Doppler
- Fig vs HashiCorp Vault
- Fig vs Chainguard
- Fig vs Authelia
- Fig vs Bitwarden
- Fig vs Delinea
- Fig vs Semgrep
- Fig vs Trivy
- Fig vs Grype
- Fig vs Ory Kratos
- Fig vs Legit Security
- Fig vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Fig vs Metasploit
- Fig vs MetricStream
- Fig vs Microsoft Defender
- Fig vs Ory
- Fig vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs Visual Studio Code
- Infisical vs ESLint
- Infisical vs Turborepo
- Infisical vs pnpm
- Infisical vs Sweep
- Infisical vs Cody
- Infisical vs Warp
- Infisical vs Keycloak
- Infisical vs Rust
- Infisical vs CodeSandbox
- Infisical vs Vite
- Infisical vs Daytona
- Infisical vs Visual Studio
- Infisical vs Xlinesoft
- Infisical vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Infisical vs Sourcegraph
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel