Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Frontegg
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Frontegg
Cybersecurity
Customer identity and access management platform for SaaS applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Frontegg detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Frontegg actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Frontegg does not also cover.
Only in Frontegg
- Hosted login
- Enterprise SSO/SCIM
- Multi-tenant organizations
- Custom domains
- M2M tokens
- Fraud protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Frontegg
- Adding enterprise SSO/SCIM to a B2B SaaS productnot Fig
- Multi-tenant customer identity managementnot Fig
- White-labeled, custom-domain login experiencesnot Fig
- Securing AI agent access to a SaaS product via Agen.conot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Frontegg
- Detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are Enterprise-only, unavailable on the Pay As You Go plan.
- The 7,500 free monthly active users is comparatively modest next to some competitors' free tiers.
- As a broader CIAM platform, it can be more complex to integrate than lighter-weight developer-first auth tools for smaller apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Frontegg
Free- Pay As You GoFree
- 7,500 monthly active users included
- 5 enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM)
- Unlimited organizations
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Multiple environments
- Advanced fraud protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Frontegg if
- You need hosted login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want enterprise sso/scim.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Frontegg better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Frontegg at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Frontegg?
- Fig starts at Free and Frontegg at Free.
- Does Fig or Frontegg run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Frontegg runs on web, api.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Frontegg cannot?
- Frontegg covers Hosted login, Enterprise SSO/SCIM, Multi-tenant organizations, Custom domains.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Frontegg: What does Frontegg cost?
Frontegg's Pay As You Go plan is free up to 7,500 monthly active users, after which pricing scales with users, enterprise connections and M2M tokens via an online calculator; Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourceFrontegg: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the free Pay As You Go plan includes 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise SSO/SCIM connections, unlimited organizations, and a custom domain.
SourceFrontegg: How is usage metered?
Pricing is consumption-based, driven by monthly active users, monthly enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM), and monthly M2M tokens, with customers paying only for usage beyond the free 7,500-user threshold.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Clerk
- Fig vs Authelia
- Fig vs Akeyless
- Fig vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Fig vs 1Password
- Fig vs authentik
- Fig vs Logto
- Fig vs Ory Kratos
- Fig vs Ping Identity
- Fig vs Speakeasy
- Fig vs Doppler
- Fig vs Infisical
- Fig vs Diligent
- Fig vs Endor Labs
- Fig vs Enpass
- Fig vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Fig vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Frontegg vs Visual Studio Code
- Frontegg vs ESLint
- Frontegg vs Turborepo
- Frontegg vs pnpm
- Frontegg vs Sweep
- Frontegg vs Cody
- Frontegg vs Warp
- Frontegg vs Keycloak
- Frontegg vs Rust
- Frontegg vs CodeSandbox
- Frontegg vs Vite
- Frontegg vs Daytona
- Frontegg vs Visual Studio
- Frontegg vs Xlinesoft
- Frontegg vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Frontegg vs Sourcegraph
- Frontegg vs Clerk
- Frontegg vs Authelia
- Frontegg vs Akeyless
- Frontegg vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Frontegg vs 1Password
- Frontegg vs authentik
- Frontegg vs Logto
- Frontegg vs Ory Kratos
- Frontegg vs Ping Identity
- Frontegg vs Speakeasy
- Frontegg vs Doppler
- Frontegg vs Infisical
- Frontegg vs Diligent
- Frontegg vs Endor Labs
- Frontegg vs Enpass
- Frontegg vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Frontegg vs Fortinet FortiGate
