Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Ory
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Ory
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity, authentication, and permissions infrastructure
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Ory production and Growth plans are billed annually ($770/year and $9,350/year), which is a larger upfront commitment than monthly-only competitors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Ory actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Ory does not also cover.
Only in Ory
- Authentication APIs
- Permissions engine
- Machine-to-machine tokens
- B2B organizations
- SAML SSO
- Multi-region deployments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Ory
- Adding self-hosted or cloud identity to a new productnot Fig
- Implementing fine-grained permission checksnot Fig
- Supporting B2B organizations and multi-tenancynot Fig
- Building machine-to-machine authentication for microservicesnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Ory
- Production and Growth plans are billed annually ($770/year and $9,350/year), which is a larger upfront commitment than monthly-only competitors.
- SAML SSO and multi-region deployments are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Usage-based pricing across aDAU, M2M tokens, and permission checks makes cost estimation more complex than flat per-MAU billing.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Ory
Free- DeveloperFree
- Community support
- No production environments
- Production$64/month
- $21 monthly credit included
- 1 production environment
- 3 staging environments
- Growth$779/month
- $255 monthly credit included
- 2 production environments
- B2B organizations (max 3)
Which should you pick?
Choose Ory if
- You need authentication apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want permissions engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Ory better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Ory at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Ory?
- Fig starts at Free and Ory at Free.
- Does Fig or Ory run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Ory runs on web, api.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Ory cannot?
- Ory covers Authentication APIs, Permissions engine, Machine-to-machine tokens, B2B organizations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ory: What does Ory cost?
Ory has a free Developer tier, a Production plan at $770/year including a $21 monthly credit, a Growth plan at $9,350/year including a $255 monthly credit, and custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceOry: How is usage metered?
Beyond the included credit, Ory charges per average daily active user (aDAU), per machine-to-machine token, and per permission check, with lower per-unit rates on the Growth plan.
SourceOry: What payment methods are supported?
Ory accepts credit cards (Visa, MasterCard, Amex) and bank transfer, processed via Stripe.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Logto
- Fig vs authentik
- Fig vs Clerk
- Fig vs Authelia
- Fig vs 1Password
- Fig vs Infisical
- Fig vs Chainguard
- Fig vs Sigstore
- Fig vs OWASP ZAP
- Fig vs Bitwarden
- Fig vs Semgrep
- Fig vs Trivy
- Fig vs Avast One
- Fig vs Cosign
- Fig vs CyberGhost VPN
- Fig vs Dahua Technology
- Ory vs Visual Studio Code
- Ory vs ESLint
- Ory vs Turborepo
- Ory vs pnpm
- Ory vs Sweep
- Ory vs Cody
- Ory vs Warp
- Ory vs Keycloak
- Ory vs Rust
- Ory vs CodeSandbox
- Ory vs Vite
- Ory vs Daytona
- Ory vs Visual Studio
- Ory vs Xlinesoft
- Ory vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ory vs Sourcegraph
- Ory vs Logto
- Ory vs authentik
- Ory vs Clerk
- Ory vs Authelia
- Ory vs 1Password
- Ory vs Infisical
- Ory vs Chainguard
- Ory vs Sigstore
- Ory vs OWASP ZAP
- Ory vs Bitwarden
- Ory vs Semgrep
- Ory vs Trivy
- Ory vs Avast One
- Ory vs Cosign
- Ory vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ory vs Dahua Technology
