Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs OpenBOM

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and OpenBOM actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot OpenBOM
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot OpenBOM
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot OpenBOM
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Augury
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Augury
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Augury
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Augury and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Augury or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Augury starts at On request.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs Fusion 360
- Augury vs Aras Innovator
- Augury vs Duro PLM
- Augury vs PTC Windchill
- Augury vs Propel
- Augury vs Materialise Magics
- Augury vs Ignition
- Augury vs Seeq
- Augury vs SolidWorks
- Augury vs Authentise
- Augury vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Augury vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Augury vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- OpenBOM vs Sensemore
- OpenBOM vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- OpenBOM vs Erbessd Instruments
- OpenBOM vs PROGNOST Systems
- OpenBOM vs Petasense
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Samotics
- OpenBOM vs Poseidon Systems
- OpenBOM vs eMaint
- OpenBOM vs ABB 800xA
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Hippo CMMS
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs 3YOURMIND
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
