Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs PROGNOST Systems

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and PROGNOST Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenBOM | PROGNOST Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, API | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot PROGNOST Systems
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot PROGNOST Systems
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot PROGNOST Systems
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot PROGNOST Systems
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot OpenBOM
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot OpenBOM
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot OpenBOM
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or PROGNOST Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and PROGNOST Systems at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or PROGNOST Systems?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and On request for PROGNOST Systems.
- Does OpenBOM or PROGNOST Systems run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PROGNOST Systems starts at On request.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what PROGNOST Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that PROGNOST Systems cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management. PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
PROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
PROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
Related pages
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Augury
- OpenBOM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- OpenBOM vs Erbessd Instruments
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Petasense
- OpenBOM vs Sensemore
- OpenBOM vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- OpenBOM vs eMaint
- OpenBOM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- OpenBOM vs Poseidon Systems
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- OpenBOM vs Simplify3D
- OpenBOM vs TrendMiner
- OpenBOM vs Xometry
- OpenBOM vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs Fusion 360
- PROGNOST Systems vs Aras Innovator
- PROGNOST Systems vs Duro PLM
- PROGNOST Systems vs PTC Windchill
- PROGNOST Systems vs Propel
- PROGNOST Systems vs Materialise Magics
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Seeq
- PROGNOST Systems vs SolidWorks
- PROGNOST Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- PROGNOST Systems vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- PROGNOST Systems vs AMFG
- PROGNOST Systems vs Authentise
- PROGNOST Systems vs COPA-DATA zenon
- PROGNOST Systems vs Autodesk Netfabb
- PROGNOST Systems vs Arena PLM
- PROGNOST Systems vs Augury
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
