Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs Propel

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and Propel actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot Propel
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot Propel
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot Propel
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot Augury
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot Augury
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot Augury
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or Propel?
- Augury starts at On request and Propel at On request.
- Does Augury or Propel run on more platforms?
- Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that Propel cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Quality management, Product information management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs Arena PLM
- Augury vs Aras Innovator
- Augury vs OpenBOM
- Augury vs Materialise Magics
- Augury vs SolidWorks
- Augury vs Fusion 360
- Augury vs TrakSYS
- Augury vs Litmus Edge
- Augury vs Ignition
- Augury vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Augury vs LabVIEW
- Augury vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs Sensemore
- Propel vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Propel vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Propel vs Erbessd Instruments
- Propel vs PROGNOST Systems
- Propel vs Petasense
- Propel vs MOVUS
- Propel vs Samotics
- Propel vs Poseidon Systems
- Propel vs eMaint
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Hippo CMMS
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs 3YOURMIND
- Propel vs AMFG
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
