Manufacturing · head to head
AMFG vs Augury

AMFG
Manufacturing
Automated quoting and production workflow software for machine shops and additive bureaus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AMFG no pricing is published in any form, and the product is sold by module and site, so total cost is invisible until you are several sales calls in.; Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- They diverge on capability: AMFG covers Geometric auto-quoting, Augury covers Halo sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AMFG and Augury actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AMFG
- Geometric auto-quoting
- 2D drawing analysis
- Production planning and scheduling
- Shop-floor control
- Quality tracking
- Customer portal
- CAD and CAM plugins
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AMFG
- A machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hoursnot Augury
- An additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machinesnot Augury
- A manufacturer running AM and CNC in the same facility and wanting one production record across bothnot Augury
- Replacing an email and spreadsheet ordering process with a customer portal that produces priced quotes automaticallynot Augury
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot AMFG
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot AMFG
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot AMFG
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot AMFG
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AMFG
- No pricing is published in any form, and the product is sold by module and site, so total cost is invisible until you are several sales calls in.
- Automated quoting only becomes accurate once your cost model, machine rates and material data are properly loaded, so the value arrives months after go-live and early quotes need human checking.
- The product started in additive manufacturing and has pivoted its marketing towards CNC machine shops, which means some CNC-specific depth is newer than the additive lineage and worth testing against your actual process mix.
- It overlaps heavily with ERP and MES scope, so shops with an existing ERP face an ownership decision over scheduling and customer records that is a political problem, not a technical one.
- It is a comparatively small vendor against established shop-floor systems, so integration work into an incumbent ERP will fall largely on you or a partner rather than on a pre-built certified connector.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
AMFG
On request- AMFG$undefined/year
- Automated quoting and estimating
- Production planning and scheduling
- Shop-floor control and quality tracking
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Which should you pick?
Choose AMFG if
- You need geometric auto-quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want 2d drawing analysis.
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Questions people ask
- Is AMFG or Augury better?
- Neither clearly leads. AMFG starts at On request and Augury at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AMFG or Augury?
- AMFG starts at On request and Augury at On request.
- Does AMFG or Augury run on more platforms?
- AMFG runs on Web, Cloud. Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is AMFG best used for?
- AMFG is most often used for a machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hours, an additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machines, a manufacturer running am and cnc in the same facility and wanting one production record across both, replacing an email and spreadsheet ordering process with a customer portal that produces priced quotes automatically. Of those, a machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hours and an additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machines are not what Augury is typically brought in for.
- What can AMFG do that Augury cannot?
- AMFG covers Geometric auto-quoting, 2D drawing analysis, Production planning and scheduling, Shop-floor control. Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AMFG: Does AMFG replace my ERP?
No. It covers quoting through shop-floor execution and quality. Finance, purchasing and inventory usually stay in the ERP, and you must decide which system owns scheduling.
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
AMFG: Is it only for 3D printing?
No, though that is where it started. It now targets CNC machine shops as well and markets quoting for machining, sheet metal and additive.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
AMFG: How accurate is automated quoting out of the box?
Not accurate until your machine rates, materials and cost model are configured. Treat the first months of quotes as assisted rather than automatic.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
AMFG: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by number of users, sites and selected modules.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- AMFG vs Paperless Parts
- AMFG vs JobBOSS²
- AMFG vs 3YOURMIND
- AMFG vs Authentise
- AMFG vs Oqton
- AMFG vs Dyndrite
- AMFG vs Materialise Magics
- AMFG vs Autodesk Netfabb
- AMFG vs Fictiv
- AMFG vs Simplify3D
- AMFG vs Formlabs PreForm
- AMFG vs GrabCAD Print
- AMFG vs Kepware Server
- AMFG vs Litmus Edge
- AMFG vs Maintenance Connection
- AMFG vs Markforged Eiger
- AMFG vs MOVUS
- AMFG vs KCF Technologies
- AMFG vs SKF Enlight Centre
- AMFG vs Sensemore
- AMFG vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- AMFG vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- AMFG vs Erbessd Instruments
- AMFG vs PROGNOST Systems
- AMFG vs Petasense
- AMFG vs Samotics
- AMFG vs Poseidon Systems
- AMFG vs eMaint
- AMFG vs ABB 800xA
- AMFG vs AVEVA System Platform
- AMFG vs Hippo CMMS
- AMFG vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs Paperless Parts
- Augury vs JobBOSS²
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs Authentise
- Augury vs Oqton
- Augury vs Dyndrite
- Augury vs Materialise Magics
- Augury vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Augury vs Fictiv
- Augury vs Simplify3D
- Augury vs Formlabs PreForm
- Augury vs GrabCAD Print
- Augury vs Kepware Server
- Augury vs Litmus Edge
- Augury vs Maintenance Connection
- Augury vs Markforged Eiger
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
