Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs Propel

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and Propel actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
Both cover
- Change management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Propel
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Propel
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Propel
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot OpenBOM
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot OpenBOM
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot OpenBOM
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want quality management.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or Propel?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and On request for Propel.
- Does OpenBOM or Propel run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Propel starts at On request.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that Propel cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Free read-only users. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Quality management, Product information management, Supplier collaboration. Both handle Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs TrakSYS
- OpenBOM vs Litmus Edge
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- OpenBOM vs LabVIEW
- OpenBOM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- OpenBOM vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs Duro PLM
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs Seeq
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs AMFG
- Propel vs Authentise
- Propel vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Propel vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
