Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs Petasense

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Petasense
Manufacturing
Wireless vibration and asset reliability monitoring, now owned by AssetWatch
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; Petasense petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Petasense covers Vibration Mote.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and Petasense actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in Petasense
- Vibration Mote
- Transmitter range
- ARO cloud
- VFD-specific monitoring
- Reliability workflow
- Mixed wired and wireless
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Petasense
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Petasense
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Petasense
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Petasense
Petasense
- A reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround routenot OpenBOM
- A plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarmsnot OpenBOM
- Mixing battery sensors on accessible pumps with wired sensors on the handful of assets that would stop productionnot OpenBOM
- A manufacturer with no in-house vibration analyst that wants the analysis delivered as a service rather than as a dashboardnot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Petasense
- Petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- Hardware is required per measurement point and gateways are required per area, so the up-front capital for a plant-wide deployment is substantial and separate from the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing scales linearly, which makes full coverage of a large population of low-value motors uneconomic compared with route-based monitoring.
- Nothing is published on sensor cost, subscription rate, gateway requirements or contract length, so a total cost of ownership figure requires a full sales engagement before you can compare it against anything.
- Battery-powered wireless sensors trade measurement richness for battery life, so the sampling rate and resolution are lower than a wired analyser would give, which limits diagnosis of high-frequency bearing defects on critical machines.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Petasense
On request- Petasense ARO$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- Vibration Mote or Transmitter hardware required per measurement point
- Gateway hardware required for wireless deployments
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose Petasense if
- You need vibration mote.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want transmitter range.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or Petasense better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and Petasense at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or Petasense?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and On request for Petasense.
- Does OpenBOM or Petasense run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. Petasense runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Petasense starts at On request.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what Petasense is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that Petasense cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management. Petasense covers Vibration Mote, Transmitter range, ARO cloud, VFD-specific monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Petasense: Is Petasense still a separate product?
Yes. It trades under its own name with its own product line, but the owner since January 2024 is AssetWatch.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Petasense: Do I have to buy Petasense hardware?
Yes. The platform is built around its own Motes and Transmitters; it is not a bring-your-own-sensor analytics product.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Petasense: Can I get monitoring as a service?
Yes, through parent AssetWatch, whose model is condition monitoring engineers reviewing your data. Clarify which model your quote covers.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Petasense: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensors and gateways. Nothing is published.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- OpenBOM vs Samotics
- OpenBOM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Augury
- OpenBOM vs eMaint
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Erbessd Instruments
- OpenBOM vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Sensemore
- OpenBOM vs Poseidon Systems
- OpenBOM vs PROGNOST Systems
- OpenBOM vs Maintenance Connection
- OpenBOM vs Markforged Eiger
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- Petasense vs Fusion 360
- Petasense vs Aras Innovator
- Petasense vs Duro PLM
- Petasense vs PTC Windchill
- Petasense vs Propel
- Petasense vs Materialise Magics
- Petasense vs Ignition
- Petasense vs Seeq
- Petasense vs SolidWorks
- Petasense vs AVEVA System Platform
- Petasense vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Petasense vs AMFG
- Petasense vs Authentise
- Petasense vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Petasense vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Petasense vs Arena PLM
- Petasense vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Petasense vs Samotics
- Petasense vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Petasense vs MOVUS
- Petasense vs Augury
- Petasense vs eMaint
- Petasense vs KCF Technologies
- Petasense vs Erbessd Instruments
- Petasense vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Petasense vs Sensemore
- Petasense vs Poseidon Systems
- Petasense vs PROGNOST Systems
- Petasense vs Maintenance Connection
- Petasense vs Markforged Eiger
- Petasense vs Oden Technologies
