Manufacturing · head to head
Aras Innovator vs OpenBOM

Aras Innovator
Manufacturing
Subscription PLM platform where every module is included in the seat price
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aras Innovator aras publishes no prices at all, so you cannot sanity-check a quote against a list price and every negotiation starts from the vendor knowing more than you do.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Aras Innovator covers Model-based configuration, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aras Innovator and OpenBOM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aras Innovator | OpenBOM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Cloud, Self-hosted | Web, Windows, macOS, API |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aras Innovator
- Model-based configuration
- Upgrades included
- All applications in one subscription
- CAD data management
- Effectivity and configuration management
- Community Edition
- Open REST and OData APIs
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aras Innovator
- A manufacturer whose current PLM cannot be upgraded because past customisations would break, and who wants configuration that survives releasesnot OpenBOM
- An engineering organisation that needs requirements, quality and change management under one data model without buying three modulesnot OpenBOM
- A medical device or aerospace firm needing full traceability from requirement to as-built serial numbernot OpenBOM
- A company piloting PLM on a real programme using the free 50-user Community Edition before committing budgetnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Aras Innovator
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Aras Innovator
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Aras Innovator
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Aras Innovator
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aras Innovator
- Aras publishes no prices at all, so you cannot sanity-check a quote against a list price and every negotiation starts from the vendor knowing more than you do.
- The platform ships as a toolkit rather than a configured process, so a first implementation is typically a six to twelve month engagement with an integrator, and services frequently cost more than the first two years of subscription.
- The Community Edition is capped at 50 named users, gets only annual releases and excludes Aras-performed upgrades, so it is a genuine free tier but a deliberately awkward place to stay.
- Configuration flexibility invites over-customisation; organisations that model every local exception end up with a system only two internal people understand, which is the same trap they left their previous PLM to escape.
- CAD connectors are not all equal in maturity, and some are excluded from the base subscription, so a shop standardised on a less common CAD tool should confirm connector scope in writing before signing.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aras Innovator
Free- Community EditionFree
- Up to 50 named users
- Core product data platform
- Yearly release cadence only
- Subscription (Standard, self-hosted)$undefined/year
- Named-user subscription
- All applications included
- Quarterly releases
- Subscription (SaaS)$undefined/year
- Aras-hosted and operated
- All applications included
- Quarterly releases
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Aras Innovator if
- You need model-based configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want upgrades included.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Aras Innovator or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aras Innovator starts at Free and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aras Innovator or OpenBOM?
- Aras Innovator starts at Free and OpenBOM at Free.
- Does Aras Innovator or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Aras Innovator runs on Web, Windows, Cloud, Self-hosted. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use Aras Innovator for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aras Innovator best used for?
- Aras Innovator is most often used for a manufacturer whose current plm cannot be upgraded because past customisations would break, and who wants configuration that survives releases, an engineering organisation that needs requirements, quality and change management under one data model without buying three modules, a medical device or aerospace firm needing full traceability from requirement to as-built serial number, a company piloting plm on a real programme using the free 50-user community edition before committing budget. Of those, a manufacturer whose current plm cannot be upgraded because past customisations would break, and who wants configuration that survives releases and an engineering organisation that needs requirements, quality and change management under one data model without buying three modules are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Aras Innovator do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Aras Innovator covers Model-based configuration, Upgrades included, All applications in one subscription, CAD data management. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aras Innovator: Is Aras Innovator open source?
No. The source is not open. The Community Edition is free of licence fee for up to 50 named users under a revocable licence, which is not the same thing.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Aras Innovator: Can I buy a perpetual licence?
No. Aras sells subscription only. If a perpetual PLM licence is a procurement requirement, Aras is out.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Aras Innovator: Do upgrades cost extra?
No, and that is the central commercial claim. Aras performs upgrades of subscriber environments, including customised ones, as part of the subscription.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Aras Innovator: How many modules do I have to buy?
One subscription covers all applications. Some CAD connectors are the exception, so confirm yours is in scope.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
More on Aras Innovator
Other head to heads
- Aras Innovator vs PTC Windchill
- Aras Innovator vs Duro PLM
- Aras Innovator vs SolidWorks
- Aras Innovator vs Propel
- Aras Innovator vs Materialise Magics
- Aras Innovator vs AVEVA System Platform
- Aras Innovator vs Ignition
- Aras Innovator vs Litmus Edge
- Aras Innovator vs Maintenance Connection
- Aras Innovator vs Seeq
- Aras Innovator vs Oden Technologies
- Aras Innovator vs Oqton
- Aras Innovator vs Paperless Parts
- Aras Innovator vs Petasense
- Aras Innovator vs Poseidon Systems
- Aras Innovator vs Arena PLM
- Aras Innovator vs Fusion 360
- Aras Innovator vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Aras Innovator vs AMFG
- Aras Innovator vs Authentise
- Aras Innovator vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Aras Innovator vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Litmus Edge
- OpenBOM vs Maintenance Connection
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Oqton
- OpenBOM vs Paperless Parts
- OpenBOM vs Petasense
- OpenBOM vs Poseidon Systems
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
