Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs Sensemore

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sensemore
Manufacturing
Low-cost wireless vibration and temperature monitoring with cloud analytics from a Turkish sensor manufacturer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; Sensemore the company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and Sensemore actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in Sensemore
- Wireless vibration sensors
- Handheld analyser
- Cloud platform
- Machine learning models
- Multi-sensor synchronisation
- Gateways
- Open API
- Alarm notifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Sensemore
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Sensemore
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Sensemore
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Sensemore
Sensemore
- A cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlistnot OpenBOM
- A mid-market manufacturer where the Western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirelynot OpenBOM
- An integrator packaging condition monitoring into a broader plant automation projectnot OpenBOM
- A water utility instrumenting remote pumping stations where sending a technician to take readings is the main costnot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Sensemore
- The company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- Support and spares are largely delivered through distributors, so response quality varies by country and buyers outside Turkey and the immediate region should verify local coverage before ordering.
- Pricing is not published and routes through integrators, which means the software cost is often bundled into a project price you cannot decompose.
- Long-term vendor viability is an open question for a venture-stage hardware company, and a sensor network is a ten-year commitment; an exit or wind-down would strand the installed hardware.
- Documentation and the analytics user interface are thinner than established competitors, so teams without vibration expertise get less guidance in interpreting what the platform flags.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Sensemore
On request- Sensemore platform$undefined/year
- Hardware purchased per monitoring point
- Cloud platform subscription quoted by sensor count
- Sold largely through distributors and system integrators
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose Sensemore if
- You need wireless vibration sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want handheld analyser.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or Sensemore better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and Sensemore at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or Sensemore?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and On request for Sensemore.
- Does OpenBOM or Sensemore run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. Sensemore runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sensemore starts at On request.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what Sensemore is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that Sensemore cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management. Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors, Handheld analyser, Cloud platform, Machine learning models.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Sensemore: Where is Sensemore based?
Istanbul, Turkey. It designs and manufactures its own sensing hardware.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Sensemore: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and platform are quoted, usually through a distributor or system integrator.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Sensemore: How does it compare on cost?
It is positioned below the established Western condition monitoring vendors, which is the reason most buyers evaluate it.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Sensemore: Can I get the raw data out?
Yes, there is a REST API and MQTT support for pulling measurements into other systems.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Augury
- OpenBOM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- OpenBOM vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Erbessd Instruments
- OpenBOM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Petasense
- OpenBOM vs Poseidon Systems
- OpenBOM vs Samotics
- OpenBOM vs PROGNOST Systems
- OpenBOM vs eMaint
- OpenBOM vs Prodsmart
- OpenBOM vs ProShop ERP
- OpenBOM vs Protolabs
- Sensemore vs Fusion 360
- Sensemore vs Aras Innovator
- Sensemore vs Duro PLM
- Sensemore vs PTC Windchill
- Sensemore vs Propel
- Sensemore vs Materialise Magics
- Sensemore vs Ignition
- Sensemore vs Seeq
- Sensemore vs SolidWorks
- Sensemore vs AVEVA System Platform
- Sensemore vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Sensemore vs AMFG
- Sensemore vs Authentise
- Sensemore vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Sensemore vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Sensemore vs Arena PLM
- Sensemore vs KCF Technologies
- Sensemore vs Augury
- Sensemore vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Sensemore vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Sensemore vs Erbessd Instruments
- Sensemore vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Sensemore vs MOVUS
- Sensemore vs Petasense
- Sensemore vs Poseidon Systems
- Sensemore vs Samotics
- Sensemore vs PROGNOST Systems
- Sensemore vs eMaint
- Sensemore vs Prodsmart
- Sensemore vs ProShop ERP
- Sensemore vs Protolabs
