Manufacturing · head to head
Duro PLM vs OpenBOM

Duro PLM
Manufacturing
Hosted PLM for hardware startups, sold in fixed user bands with no published price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Duro PLM no pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Duro PLM covers Part library, OpenBOM covers Part catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duro PLM and OpenBOM actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duro PLM
- Part library
- Change orders
- CAD integrations
- Supplier and cost data
- User band plans
Only in OpenBOM
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Both cover
- Multi-level BOMs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duro PLM
- A robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturernot OpenBOM
- A consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the BOMnot OpenBOM
- A hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's BOM spreadsheet versionsnot OpenBOM
- A venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production buildnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Duro PLM
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Duro PLM
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Duro PLM
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Duro PLM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duro PLM
- No pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.
- Plans are sold in fixed user bands rather than per seat, so hiring an eleventh engineer moves you to the next tier instead of adding one seat.
- Storage allowances are capped at 25, 50 and 100 GB, which is tight for teams keeping native CAD files rather than only neutral formats.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premises option, which rules Duro out for defence and some aerospace suppliers with data residency or ITAR handling constraints.
- Scope stops at engineering data: no requirements management, no quality module and no manufacturing process planning, so it does not replace the systems a company needs at production scale.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duro PLM
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Up to 10 users
- 25 GB data storage
- Part library, BOMs and change orders
- Business$undefined/year
- Up to 20 users
- 50 GB data storage
- CAD integrations
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 20 or more users
- 100 GB data storage
- Extended support
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need part catalogue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want cad add-ins.
Questions people ask
- Is Duro PLM or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duro PLM starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duro PLM or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Duro PLM and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Duro PLM or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Duro PLM runs on Web. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Duro PLM starts at On request.
- What is Duro PLM best used for?
- Duro PLM is most often used for a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer, a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom, a hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's bom spreadsheet versions, a venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production build. Of those, a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer and a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Duro PLM do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Duro PLM covers Part library, Change orders, CAD integrations, Supplier and cost data. OpenBOM covers Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management, Free read-only users. Both handle Multi-level BOMs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duro PLM: How much does Duro cost?
Duro does not publish prices. Plans are fixed annual subscriptions quoted by sales against a user band, billed Net 30.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Duro PLM: Can I run Duro on my own servers?
No. It is cloud only, which is a hard blocker for organisations with data residency or export control requirements.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Duro PLM: What happens when we exceed our user band?
You move to the next tier rather than adding individual seats, so growth arrives as a step change in cost.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Duro PLM: Is Duro suitable for medical device work?
Its change control is real but the workflow configuration and audit depth are lighter than dedicated regulated-industry PLM, so most ISO 13485 programmes need more.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duro PLM vs Fusion 360
- Duro PLM vs PTC Windchill
- Duro PLM vs Aras Innovator
- Duro PLM vs Propel
- Duro PLM vs Augury
- Duro PLM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Duro PLM vs KCF Technologies
- Duro PLM vs MOVUS
- Duro PLM vs Sight Machine
- Duro PLM vs TrakSYS
- Duro PLM vs AMFG
- Duro PLM vs Authentise
- Duro PLM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Duro PLM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Duro PLM vs Arena PLM
- Duro PLM vs Materialise Magics
- Duro PLM vs Ignition
- Duro PLM vs Seeq
- Duro PLM vs SolidWorks
- Duro PLM vs AVEVA System Platform
- Duro PLM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Augury
- OpenBOM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Sight Machine
- OpenBOM vs TrakSYS
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
