Manufacturing · head to head
Authentise vs OpenBOM

Authentise
Manufacturing
Modular MES and workflow automation for additive manufacturing, with ITAR-capable deployment options
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authentise nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authentise and OpenBOM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authentise | OpenBOM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, Windows, macOS, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authentise
- Additive workflow automation
- Machine data capture
- Traceability
- Modular deployment
- ITAR-capable hosting
- Scheduling
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authentise
- An additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendorsnot OpenBOM
- An aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidencenot OpenBOM
- A defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under ITAR-compliant hostingnot OpenBOM
- A corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sitesnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Authentise
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Authentise
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Authentise
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Authentise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authentise
- Nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.
- It is additive-specific, so a shop with significant machining, casting or fabrication work still needs a second MES and an integration between them.
- The ITAR-capable deployment that justifies the price is irrelevant to purely commercial shops, which then find the system expensive relative to general manufacturing software.
- Integrating with the ERP and PLM systems that already hold part and order data is project work, and the burden falls on a small vendor rather than a large systems integrator ecosystem.
- Company scale is modest against the industrial software incumbents, which is a real consideration for a system sitting in the traceability path of qualified aerospace parts.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authentise
On request- Authentise Flows and MES modules$undefined/year
- Modular licensing by function
- Public cloud, private SaaS or ITAR-compliant deployment
- Machine data capture and traceability
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Authentise if
- You need additive workflow automation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want machine data capture.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Authentise or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authentise starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authentise or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Authentise and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Authentise or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Authentise runs on Web, API. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Authentise starts at On request.
- What is Authentise best used for?
- Authentise is most often used for an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors, an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence, a defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under itar-compliant hosting, a corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sites. Of those, an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors and an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Authentise do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Machine data capture, Traceability, Modular deployment. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authentise: How is Authentise priced?
It is not published. Licensing is modular and quoted annually, with integration and onboarding priced separately.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Authentise: Can it handle ITAR-controlled work?
Yes. It offers ITAR-compliant deployment alongside public cloud and private SaaS, which is a primary reason defence suppliers choose it.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Authentise: Does it work with printers from more than one manufacturer?
Yes. It is designed for mixed fleets and captures machine data across vendors, which single-vendor software will not do.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Authentise: Is it a full MES for a general machine shop?
No. It is built around additive workflows; subtractive-heavy shops need a general MES as well.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authentise vs Fulcrum
- Authentise vs Tulip
- Authentise vs MachineMetrics
- Authentise vs Oqton
- Authentise vs 3YOURMIND
- Authentise vs Prodsmart
- Authentise vs TrakSYS
- Authentise vs AMFG
- Authentise vs Materialise Magics
- Authentise vs Flow Software
- Authentise vs ProShop ERP
- Authentise vs Ignition
- Authentise vs QAD Redzone
- Authentise vs Seeq
- Authentise vs Sensemore
- Authentise vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Authentise vs Simplify3D
- Authentise vs TrendMiner
- Authentise vs Fusion 360
- Authentise vs Aras Innovator
- Authentise vs Duro PLM
- Authentise vs PTC Windchill
- Authentise vs Propel
- Authentise vs SolidWorks
- Authentise vs AVEVA System Platform
- Authentise vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Authentise vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Authentise vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Authentise vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Fulcrum
- OpenBOM vs Tulip
- OpenBOM vs MachineMetrics
- OpenBOM vs Oqton
- OpenBOM vs 3YOURMIND
- OpenBOM vs Prodsmart
- OpenBOM vs TrakSYS
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Flow Software
- OpenBOM vs ProShop ERP
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs QAD Redzone
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs Sensemore
- OpenBOM vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- OpenBOM vs Simplify3D
- OpenBOM vs TrendMiner
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
