Recruitment · head to head
Ashby vs Manatal

Manatal
Recruitment
Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ashby no native iOS or Android mobile app; only mobile web access with limited functionality; Manatal pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
- They diverge on capability: Ashby covers Applicant Tracking, Manatal covers Candidate enrichment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ashby and Manatal actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ashby
- Applicant Tracking
- CRM
- Scheduling
- Analytics
- Sourcing
- Offer Management
- Slack
Only in Manatal
- Candidate enrichment
- AI candidate scoring
- Recruitment CRM
- Multi-board posting
- CV parsing
- Careers page builder
- Custom pipelines
Both cover
- Reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ashby
- End to end applicant tracking for startups through to enterprisenot Manatal
- Sourcing and candidate relationship managementnot Manatal
- Interview scheduling and coordinationnot Manatal
- Recruiting analytics, including as a standalone module alongside an existing ATSnot Manatal
- Structured hiring and consistent candidate assessmentnot Manatal
Manatal
- A small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contractnot Ashby
- An in-house team in Asia Pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ATS pricesnot Ashby
- A company processing high applicant volume that needs automated ranking to triage a shortlistnot Ashby
- A recruiter running both contingent search and internal hiring from one databasenot Ashby
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ashby
- No native iOS or Android mobile app; only mobile web access with limited functionality
- Email lookup quotas and limited bulk actions for high-volume sourcing workflows
- Advanced workflow branching and custom fields system are less flexible than competitors
Manatal
- Pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
- Candidate enrichment depends on public profile data, so accuracy drops sharply in markets where professional networking sites have low penetration and the scores become misleading rather than useful.
- Integrations with major HRIS and payroll systems are limited compared with Western competitors, so new hire handover is frequently a CSV export rather than a sync.
- Support operates on Indochina business hours, which leaves European afternoons and all of North American working hours outside the responsive window.
- Reporting covers recruiter activity and source data but lacks the cohort and quality-of-hire analysis a mature talent function expects, and custom analysis means exporting to a spreadsheet.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ashby
$400/month- Foundations$400/month
- Core ATS
- Scheduling
- Basic reporting
Manatal
On request- Professional$undefined/month
- Per recruiter seat
- Unlimited jobs and candidates
- Candidate enrichment and AI scoring
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Per recruiter seat at a higher rate
- Custom fields and advanced permissions
- Recruitment CRM for agency use
- Custom$undefined/year
- Negotiated terms for larger teams
- Single sign-on and security review
- Dedicated account management
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Ashby or Manatal better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ashby starts at $400/month and Manatal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ashby or Manatal?
- Ashby starts at $400/month and Manatal at On request.
- Does Ashby or Manatal run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Ashby best used for?
- Ashby is most often used for end to end applicant tracking for startups through to enterprise, sourcing and candidate relationship management, interview scheduling and coordination, recruiting analytics, including as a standalone module alongside an existing ats. Of those, end to end applicant tracking for startups through to enterprise and sourcing and candidate relationship management are not what Manatal is typically brought in for.
- What can Ashby do that Manatal cannot?
- Ashby covers Applicant Tracking, CRM, Scheduling, Analytics. Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, AI candidate scoring, Recruitment CRM, Multi-board posting. Both handle Reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ashby: What integrations does Ashby support?
Ashby integrates with Slack for recruiting notifications, Zapier for automation with 9,000+ apps, and has an open API for custom workflows. It also supports 250+ marketplace integrations.
SourceManatal: Is it for agencies or in-house teams?
Both. The agency mode adds client and placement management; the corporate mode is a conventional ATS. Buying the wrong mode means paying for modules you never open.
Ashby: Does Ashby have a mobile app?
Ashby does not have native iOS or Android apps. The platform is cloud-based accessible via mobile web, but mobile functionality is limited compared to desktop.
SourceManatal: How is it priced compared with other ATS products?
Per recruiter seat per month. That is not comparable with vendors that charge per active job slot or per employee, so model your real user count before comparing headline numbers.
Ashby: What is the minimum price for Ashby?
The Foundations plan starts at $400 per month for companies up to 100 employees. Plus and Enterprise plans are custom quoted based on company size.
SourceManatal: Where is candidate data hosted?
On cloud infrastructure with GDPR commitments, but region-specific residency guarantees are weaker than EU-native vendors offer, which matters for regulated European buyers.
Ashby: Can Ashby create and update jobs across multiple job boards?
Yes, Ashby integrates with job boards and allows you to manage candidate pipeline, scheduling, and analytics in one platform.
SourceManatal: Does the AI scoring actually work?
It ranks reliably against structured requirements such as skills and experience length. It is far less reliable where enrichment data is sparse.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ashby vs Lever
- Ashby vs Jobvite
- Ashby vs Teamtailor
- Ashby vs SmartRecruiters
- Ashby vs JazzHR
- Ashby vs iCIMS
- Ashby vs Breezy HR
- Ashby vs Rippling
- Ashby vs Workable
- Ashby vs Deel
- Ashby vs Factorial
- Ashby vs Pilot
- Ashby vs HackerRank
- Ashby vs Indeed
- Ashby vs JobScore
- Ashby vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Ashby vs Bullhorn
- Ashby vs JobAdder
- Ashby vs Recruitee
- Ashby vs SeekOut
- Ashby vs Glassdoor
- Ashby vs Checkr
- Ashby vs Comeet
- Ashby vs Findem
- Ashby vs Karat
- Ashby vs Metaview
- Ashby vs Occupop
- Ashby vs Oracle Taleo
- Manatal vs Lever
- Manatal vs Jobvite
- Manatal vs Teamtailor
- Manatal vs SmartRecruiters
- Manatal vs JazzHR
- Manatal vs iCIMS
- Manatal vs Breezy HR
- Manatal vs Rippling
- Manatal vs Workable
- Manatal vs Deel
- Manatal vs Factorial
- Manatal vs Pilot
- Manatal vs HackerRank
- Manatal vs Indeed
- Manatal vs JobScore
- Manatal vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Manatal vs Bullhorn
- Manatal vs JobAdder
- Manatal vs Recruitee
- Manatal vs SeekOut
- Manatal vs Glassdoor
- Manatal vs Checkr
- Manatal vs Comeet
- Manatal vs Findem
- Manatal vs Karat
- Manatal vs Metaview
- Manatal vs Occupop
- Manatal vs Oracle Taleo

