Is Comeet or Manatal better?

Neither clearly leads. Comeet starts at On request and Manatal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Comeet or Manatal?

Comeet starts at On request and Manatal at On request.

Does Comeet or Manatal run on more platforms?

Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.

What is Comeet best used for?

Comeet is most often used for a company where hiring consistently stalls on manager review and nobody can say whose turn it is, a technology firm running structured interview loops with several interviewers per candidate, an organisation that wants to measure which stage and which person creates the bottleneck, a team that already uses spark hire video interviewing and wants it inside the hiring process. Of those, a company where hiring consistently stalls on manager review and nobody can say whose turn it is and a technology firm running structured interview loops with several interviewers per candidate are not what Manatal is typically brought in for.

What can Comeet do that Manatal cannot?

Comeet covers Assigned hiring steps, Elastic workflows, Sourcing, Scorecards. Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, AI candidate scoring, Recruitment CRM, Multi-board posting. Both handle Reporting.

Recruitment · head to head

Comeet vs Manatal

Comeet

Recruitment

Structured collaborative hiring where every stage is assigned to a named person, now part of Spark Hire

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Manatal

Recruitment

Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Comeet the assigned-step model assumes disciplined process ownership, and in companies that hire opportunistically recruiters bypass it, which leaves the reporting describing a process nobody follows.; Manatal pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
They diverge on capability: Comeet covers Assigned hiring steps, Manatal covers Candidate enrichment.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Comeet and Manatal actually diverge.

Attributes where Comeet and Manatal differ
Attribute	Comeet	Manatal
Pricing model	quote	Per user per month

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Comeet

Assigned hiring steps
Elastic workflows
Sourcing
Scorecards
Scheduling
Careers site
Offer management

Only in Manatal

Candidate enrichment
AI candidate scoring
Recruitment CRM
Multi-board posting
CV parsing
Careers page builder
Custom pipelines

Both cover

Reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Comeet

A company where hiring consistently stalls on manager review and nobody can say whose turn it isnot Manatal
A technology firm running structured interview loops with several interviewers per candidatenot Manatal
An organisation that wants to measure which stage and which person creates the bottlenecknot Manatal
A team that already uses Spark Hire video interviewing and wants it inside the hiring processnot Manatal

Manatal

A small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contractnot Comeet
An in-house team in Asia Pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ATS pricesnot Comeet
A company processing high applicant volume that needs automated ranking to triage a shortlistnot Comeet
A recruiter running both contingent search and internal hiring from one databasenot Comeet

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Comeet

The assigned-step model assumes disciplined process ownership, and in companies that hire opportunistically recruiters bypass it, which leaves the reporting describing a process nobody follows.
Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with company size and hiring volume, so it cannot be compared against per seat or per job slot competitors without going through a sales cycle.
Sourcing and candidate relationship management are thinner than dedicated tools, so passive outreach still happens in LinkedIn and is recorded after the fact.
The 2023 acquisition by Spark Hire places an independent ATS inside a portfolio company, and buyers should ask for explicit standalone roadmap commitments before signing a multi-year term.
Support and product hours have historically followed Israeli and US eastern time, which leaves European and Asia Pacific customers with narrow overlap for anything urgent.

Manatal

Pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
Candidate enrichment depends on public profile data, so accuracy drops sharply in markets where professional networking sites have low penetration and the scores become misleading rather than useful.
Integrations with major HRIS and payroll systems are limited compared with Western competitors, so new hire handover is frequently a CSV export rather than a sync.
Support operates on Indochina business hours, which leaves European afternoons and all of North American working hours outside the responsive window.
Reporting covers recruiter activity and source data but lacks the cohort and quality-of-hire analysis a mature talent function expects, and custom analysis means exporting to a spreadsheet.

Pricing, plan by plan

Comeet

On request

Comeet$undefined/year
- Quoted by company size and hiring volume rather than published per seat
- Unlimited users on standard terms
- Elastic workflow engine and scorecards

Manatal

On request

Professional$undefined/month
- Per recruiter seat
- Unlimited jobs and candidates
- Candidate enrichment and AI scoring
Enterprise$undefined/month
- Per recruiter seat at a higher rate
- Custom fields and advanced permissions
- Recruitment CRM for agency use
Custom$undefined/year
- Negotiated terms for larger teams
- Single sign-on and security review
- Dedicated account management

Which should you pick?

Choose Comeet if

You need assigned hiring steps.
You also want elastic workflows.

Comeet review

Choose Manatal if

You need candidate enrichment.
You also want ai candidate scoring.

Manatal review

Questions people ask

Is Comeet or Manatal better?: Neither clearly leads. Comeet starts at On request and Manatal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Comeet or Manatal?: Comeet starts at On request and Manatal at On request.
Does Comeet or Manatal run on more platforms?: Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Comeet best used for?: Comeet is most often used for a company where hiring consistently stalls on manager review and nobody can say whose turn it is, a technology firm running structured interview loops with several interviewers per candidate, an organisation that wants to measure which stage and which person creates the bottleneck, a team that already uses spark hire video interviewing and wants it inside the hiring process. Of those, a company where hiring consistently stalls on manager review and nobody can say whose turn it is and a technology firm running structured interview loops with several interviewers per candidate are not what Manatal is typically brought in for.
What can Comeet do that Manatal cannot?: Comeet covers Assigned hiring steps, Elastic workflows, Sourcing, Scorecards. Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, AI candidate scoring, Recruitment CRM, Multi-board posting. Both handle Reporting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Comeet: What is elastic recruiting?

Each step of a hiring process is assigned to a named person with a defined action and deadline, and the system tracks completion rather than leaving candidates in an unowned queue.

Manatal: Is it for agencies or in-house teams?

Both. The agency mode adds client and placement management; the corporate mode is a conventional ATS. Buying the wrong mode means paying for modules you never open.

Comeet: Who owns Comeet?

Spark Hire acquired it in 2023 and sells it alongside video interviewing and assessment products.

Manatal: How is it priced compared with other ATS products?

Per recruiter seat per month. That is not comparable with vendors that charge per active job slot or per employee, so model your real user count before comparing headline numbers.

Comeet: How is it priced?

By quote, based on company size and hiring volume, with unlimited users rather than per recruiter seats.

Manatal: Where is candidate data hosted?

On cloud infrastructure with GDPR commitments, but region-specific residency guarantees are weaker than EU-native vendors offer, which matters for regulated European buyers.

Comeet: Is it a good fit for low-volume hiring?

Not especially. The structure pays off when several people are involved in every hire and process delay is the real problem.

Manatal: Does the AI scoring actually work?

It ranks reliably against structured requirements such as skills and experience length. It is far less reliable where enrichment data is sparse.

Comeet vs Manatal

Comeet

Manatal

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Comeet

Only in Manatal

Both cover

What people use each for

Comeet

Manatal

Where each one falls short

Comeet

Manatal

Pricing, plan by plan

Comeet

Manatal

Which should you pick?

Choose Comeet if

Choose Manatal if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Comeet

More on Manatal

Keep looking

Other head to heads