Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs Fleet Complete

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Free plan
- No

Fleet Complete
Fleet Management
Telematics and asset tracking sold mainly through mobile network operators
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; Fleet Complete because most contracts are sold through a carrier, the commercial relationship, the service levels and the renewal date belong to the carrier, so a pricing dispute or a support escalation goes through a reseller who did not build the software.
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Fleet Complete covers Vehicle tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and Fleet Complete actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | Fleet Complete |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in Fleet Complete
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Asset trackers
- Field dispatch
- Dashcams
- Maintenance reminders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot Fleet Complete
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot Fleet Complete
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot Fleet Complete
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot Fleet Complete
Fleet Complete
- A mid-size fleet already under a national carrier contract that wants tracking added to an existing telecoms agreement rather than a new vendor relationshipnot Agisoft Metashape
- Mixed fleets that need to track unpowered assets such as trailers and generators alongside vehicles in one consolenot Agisoft Metashape
- Canadian operators wanting a domestic vendor with local support and Telus channel billingnot Agisoft Metashape
- Service businesses that want basic dispatch and vehicle tracking without buying a separate field service platformnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
Fleet Complete
- Because most contracts are sold through a carrier, the commercial relationship, the service levels and the renewal date belong to the carrier, so a pricing dispute or a support escalation goes through a reseller who did not build the software.
- Hardware is bundled into the subscription over a multi-year term, so a fleet that shrinks mid-contract keeps paying for units that are sitting in a store cupboard unless it negotiated a downsizing clause up front.
- The product line was assembled by acquisition, so hours of service, European tracking and the core platform originated as separate products, leaving overlapping apps, duplicate logins and features that exist in one region but not another.
- The third-party integration ecosystem is far smaller than the marketplaces run by Geotab or Samsara, so bespoke connections to a maintenance or payroll system usually mean building against the API yourself.
- The web console and reporting look and behave like software designed a decade ago, and administrators who have used a newer platform will find the reporting builder slow and the exports rigid.
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
Fleet Complete
On request- Fleet Complete$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription, hardware included
- Term length usually tied to the reselling carrier agreement
- Asset trackers priced separately from vehicle units
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose Fleet Complete if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or Fleet Complete better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Fleet Complete at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or Fleet Complete?
- Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Fleet Complete at On request.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or Fleet Complete run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Fleet Complete runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what Fleet Complete is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that Fleet Complete cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. Fleet Complete covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Asset trackers, Field dispatch.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
Fleet Complete: Do I buy Fleet Complete directly or through my mobile operator?
Both are possible, but the majority of North American customers buy through AT&T or Telus. Check which entity the contract is with, because it determines your support path, your billing cycle and your renewal date.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
Fleet Complete: What happens to the hardware if I cancel?
Devices supplied as part of a subsidised subscription are normally recovered or charged for on early termination. Ask for the exact clause before signing, because it is where the real cost of leaving sits.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Fleet Complete: Is it a fit for a fleet of five vans?
It will work, but small fleets get a better deal from vendors that publish pricing and sell month to month. Fleet Complete pricing improves with volume and a carrier relationship.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on Fleet Complete
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Samsara
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geotab
- Agisoft Metashape vs Verizon Connect
- Agisoft Metashape vs Motive
- Agisoft Metashape vs CalAmp
- Agisoft Metashape vs Webfleet
- Agisoft Metashape vs Zonar Systems
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lytx
- Agisoft Metashape vs NexTraq
- Agisoft Metashape vs Uptake
- Agisoft Metashape vs AssetWorks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Chevin FleetWave
- Agisoft Metashape vs Quartix
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ridecell
- Agisoft Metashape vs Whip Around
- Fleet Complete vs QGIS
- Fleet Complete vs Correlator3D
- Fleet Complete vs Global Mapper
- Fleet Complete vs Cesium ion
- Fleet Complete vs Potree
- Fleet Complete vs Leica Infinity
- Fleet Complete vs Emlid Studio
- Fleet Complete vs onX Maps
- Fleet Complete vs SW Maps
- Fleet Complete vs Fused
- Fleet Complete vs Lonboard
- Fleet Complete vs Trailforks
- Fleet Complete vs Atlas.co
- Fleet Complete vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Fleet Complete vs Felt
- Fleet Complete vs Geographic Calculator
- Fleet Complete vs Samsara
- Fleet Complete vs Geotab
- Fleet Complete vs Verizon Connect
- Fleet Complete vs Motive
- Fleet Complete vs CalAmp
- Fleet Complete vs Webfleet
- Fleet Complete vs Zonar Systems
- Fleet Complete vs Lytx
- Fleet Complete vs NexTraq
- Fleet Complete vs Uptake
- Fleet Complete vs AssetWorks
- Fleet Complete vs Chevin FleetWave
- Fleet Complete vs Quartix
- Fleet Complete vs Ridecell
- Fleet Complete vs Whip Around
