Fleet Management · head to head
Fleet Complete vs Potree

Fleet Complete
Fleet Management
Telematics and asset tracking sold mainly through mobile network operators
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Potree
Maps
Open source WebGL viewer for publishing very large point clouds in a browser
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Potree has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fleet Complete because most contracts are sold through a carrier, the commercial relationship, the service levels and the renewal date belong to the carrier, so a pricing dispute or a support escalation goes through a reseller who did not build the software.; Potree there is no vendor, no support contract and no service level, so anything you build on Potree is your organisation’s responsibility to maintain when a browser update breaks rendering.
- They diverge on capability: Fleet Complete covers Vehicle tracking, Potree covers Octree streaming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fleet Complete and Potree actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fleet Complete | Potree |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fleet Complete
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Asset trackers
- Field dispatch
- Dashcams
- Maintenance reminders
Only in Potree
- Octree streaming
- Large dataset rendering
- Measurement tools
- Clipping and profiles
- Annotations
- Attribute colouring
- PotreeDesktop
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fleet Complete
- A mid-size fleet already under a national carrier contract that wants tracking added to an existing telecoms agreement rather than a new vendor relationshipnot Potree
- Mixed fleets that need to track unpowered assets such as trailers and generators alongside vehicles in one consolenot Potree
- Canadian operators wanting a domestic vendor with local support and Telus channel billingnot Potree
- Service businesses that want basic dispatch and vehicle tracking without buying a separate field service platformnot Potree
Potree
- A drone survey firm delivering a point cloud to a client who has no desktop software, by publishing a browser viewer link instead of a 40 GB LAZ filenot Fleet Complete
- A heritage or archaeology project publishing a scanned site for public access without paying per-gigabyte hosting to a commercial platformnot Fleet Complete
- An engineering consultancy embedding a point cloud viewer inside its own client portal without licensing a commercial web viewernot Fleet Complete
- A university or research group that needs measurement and profiling in a shareable viewer for a dataset too large to emailnot Fleet Complete
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fleet Complete
- Because most contracts are sold through a carrier, the commercial relationship, the service levels and the renewal date belong to the carrier, so a pricing dispute or a support escalation goes through a reseller who did not build the software.
- Hardware is bundled into the subscription over a multi-year term, so a fleet that shrinks mid-contract keeps paying for units that are sitting in a store cupboard unless it negotiated a downsizing clause up front.
- The product line was assembled by acquisition, so hours of service, European tracking and the core platform originated as separate products, leaving overlapping apps, duplicate logins and features that exist in one region but not another.
- The third-party integration ecosystem is far smaller than the marketplaces run by Geotab or Samsara, so bespoke connections to a maintenance or payroll system usually mean building against the API yourself.
- The web console and reporting look and behave like software designed a decade ago, and administrators who have used a newer platform will find the reporting builder slow and the exports rigid.
Potree
- There is no vendor, no support contract and no service level, so anything you build on Potree is your organisation’s responsibility to maintain when a browser update breaks rendering.
- Conversion is a separate manual step with PotreeConverter, and building an automated publishing pipeline around it is engineering work the project does not provide.
- Rendering quality and performance depend on the client machine and WebGL support, so a client on a locked-down corporate laptop with poor graphics may see a viewer that stutters or fails outright.
- A WebGPU rewrite, Potree-Next, is in progress and is not a drop-in upgrade, so current integrations face an eventual migration with no vendor to manage it.
- There is no access control, user management or audit layer; anyone with the URL sees the data unless you build authentication around the static files yourself, which is a real problem for confidential sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fleet Complete
On request- Fleet Complete$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription, hardware included
- Term length usually tied to the reselling carrier agreement
- Asset trackers priced separately from vehicle units
Potree
Free- PotreeFree
- BSD-style open source licence
- Unlimited datasets and viewers
- Self-hosted on any static web server
Which should you pick?
Choose Fleet Complete if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Choose Potree if
- You need octree streaming.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want large dataset rendering.
Questions people ask
- Is Fleet Complete or Potree better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fleet Complete starts at On request and Potree at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fleet Complete or Potree?
- Potree has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Fleet Complete and Free for Potree.
- Does Fleet Complete or Potree run on more platforms?
- Fleet Complete runs on Web, iOS, Android. Potree runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Potree for free?
- Yes. Potree has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fleet Complete starts at On request.
- What is Fleet Complete best used for?
- Fleet Complete is most often used for a mid-size fleet already under a national carrier contract that wants tracking added to an existing telecoms agreement rather than a new vendor relationship, mixed fleets that need to track unpowered assets such as trailers and generators alongside vehicles in one console, canadian operators wanting a domestic vendor with local support and telus channel billing, service businesses that want basic dispatch and vehicle tracking without buying a separate field service platform. Of those, a mid-size fleet already under a national carrier contract that wants tracking added to an existing telecoms agreement rather than a new vendor relationship and mixed fleets that need to track unpowered assets such as trailers and generators alongside vehicles in one console are not what Potree is typically brought in for.
- What can Fleet Complete do that Potree cannot?
- Fleet Complete covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Asset trackers, Field dispatch. Potree covers Octree streaming, Large dataset rendering, Measurement tools, Clipping and profiles.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fleet Complete: Do I buy Fleet Complete directly or through my mobile operator?
Both are possible, but the majority of North American customers buy through AT&T or Telus. Check which entity the contract is with, because it determines your support path, your billing cycle and your renewal date.
Potree: Does Potree cost anything?
No. It is open source and free. You supply the hosting, which for a static viewer is inexpensive.
Fleet Complete: What happens to the hardware if I cancel?
Devices supplied as part of a subsidised subscription are normally recovered or charged for on early termination. Ask for the exact clause before signing, because it is where the real cost of leaving sits.
Potree: Is there commercial support?
No. There is no vendor and no support contract. Support is GitHub issues and the community.
Fleet Complete: Is it a fit for a fleet of five vans?
It will work, but small fleets get a better deal from vendors that publish pricing and sell month to month. Fleet Complete pricing improves with volume and a carrier relationship.
Potree: Who maintains it?
It originated at TU Wien and is maintained principally by Markus Schütz, with community contributions.
Potree: Can it handle very large clouds?
Yes, hundreds of millions of points, because PotreeConverter builds a multi-resolution octree that streams only what is visible.
Potree: Is my data private?
Only if you make it so. Potree serves static files with no built-in authentication, so access control is entirely your responsibility.
Related pages
More on Fleet Complete
Other head to heads
- Fleet Complete vs Samsara
- Fleet Complete vs Geotab
- Fleet Complete vs Verizon Connect
- Fleet Complete vs Motive
- Fleet Complete vs CalAmp
- Fleet Complete vs Webfleet
- Fleet Complete vs Zonar Systems
- Fleet Complete vs Lytx
- Fleet Complete vs NexTraq
- Fleet Complete vs Uptake
- Fleet Complete vs AssetWorks
- Fleet Complete vs Chevin FleetWave
- Fleet Complete vs Quartix
- Fleet Complete vs Ridecell
- Fleet Complete vs Whip Around
- Fleet Complete vs WhiteboxTools
- Fleet Complete vs QGIS
- Fleet Complete vs Global Mapper
- Fleet Complete vs Agisoft Metashape
- Fleet Complete vs Lonboard
- Fleet Complete vs SAGA GIS
- Fleet Complete vs GRASS GIS
- Fleet Complete vs Leica Infinity
- Fleet Complete vs deck.gl
- Fleet Complete vs Felt
- Fleet Complete vs Ride with GPS
- Fleet Complete vs Kepler.gl
- Fleet Complete vs Trailforks
- Fleet Complete vs AllTrails
- Fleet Complete vs Bing Maps
- Fleet Complete vs Cesium ion
- Fleet Complete vs Citymapper
- Potree vs Samsara
- Potree vs Geotab
- Potree vs Verizon Connect
- Potree vs Motive
- Potree vs CalAmp
- Potree vs Webfleet
- Potree vs Zonar Systems
- Potree vs Lytx
- Potree vs NexTraq
- Potree vs Uptake
- Potree vs AssetWorks
- Potree vs Chevin FleetWave
- Potree vs Quartix
- Potree vs Ridecell
- Potree vs Whip Around
- Potree vs WhiteboxTools
- Potree vs QGIS
- Potree vs Global Mapper
- Potree vs Agisoft Metashape
- Potree vs Lonboard
- Potree vs SAGA GIS
- Potree vs GRASS GIS
- Potree vs Leica Infinity
- Potree vs deck.gl
- Potree vs Felt
- Potree vs Ride with GPS
- Potree vs Kepler.gl
- Potree vs Trailforks
- Potree vs AllTrails
- Potree vs Bing Maps
- Potree vs Cesium ion
- Potree vs Citymapper
