Softwr

Marketing · head to head

AB Tasty vs Roxhill

AB Tasty logo

AB Tasty

Marketing

Conversion optimization platform

From
€500/month
Rated
-
Roxhill logo

Roxhill

Marketing

UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: AB Tasty no transparent pricing published; requires custom sales conversation for any quote; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • They diverge on capability: AB Tasty covers A/B testing, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which AB Tasty and Roxhill actually diverge.

Attributes where AB Tasty and Roxhill differ
AttributeAB TastyRoxhill
Starting price€500/monthOn request
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android
Founded2011Unknown

Identical on both: pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in AB Tasty

  • A/B testing
  • Multivariate testing
  • Personalization
  • Visual editor
  • Google Analytics
  • Salesforce
  • SSL encryption
  • Cloud deployment

Only in Roxhill

  • Journalist database
  • Journalist profiles
  • Media lists and distribution
  • Media requests and alerts
  • Media monitoring
  • Bespoke newsletters
  • Historical search
  • Journalist Assistant

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

AB Tasty

  • A/B and multivariate testing on web and mobilenot Roxhill
  • Feature flagging and progressive rolloutsnot Roxhill
  • Personalising content for identified and anonymous visitorsnot Roxhill
  • Search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommercenot Roxhill
  • Conversion optimisation experiments across channelsnot Roxhill

Roxhill

  • A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not AB Tasty
  • An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not AB Tasty
  • A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not AB Tasty
  • A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not AB Tasty

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

AB Tasty

  • No transparent pricing published; requires custom sales conversation for any quote
  • Pricing determined by traffic volume, number of domains, and selected modules
  • No fixed pricing plans available; all customers receive individualized proposals

Roxhill

  • The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
  • At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
  • Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
  • Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
  • Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
  • Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.

Pricing, plan by plan

AB Tasty

€500/month
  • Standard$500/month
    • A/B testing
    • Basic personalization
    • Analytics

Roxhill

On request
  • Core$undefined/year
    • 1 licence
    • Standard database access
    • Journalist Assistant
  • Boutique$undefined/year
    • 3 licences
    • Adds press release distribution
    • 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • 5 licences
    • 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
    • Spokespeople platform
  • Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Enterprise
    • Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
    • Competitor share of voice

Which should you pick?

Choose AB Tasty if

  • You need a/b testing.
  • You also want multivariate testing.

Choose Roxhill if

  • You need journalist database.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want journalist profiles.

Questions people ask

Is AB Tasty or Roxhill better?
Neither clearly leads. AB Tasty starts at €500/month and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, AB Tasty or Roxhill?
AB Tasty starts at €500/month and Roxhill at On request.
Does AB Tasty or Roxhill run on more platforms?
AB Tasty runs on Web. Roxhill runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is AB Tasty best used for?
AB Tasty is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile, feature flagging and progressive rollouts, personalising content for identified and anonymous visitors, search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommerce. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile and feature flagging and progressive rollouts are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
What can AB Tasty do that Roxhill cannot?
AB Tasty covers A/B testing, Multivariate testing, Personalization, Visual editor. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Journalist profiles, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

AB Tasty: How does AB Tasty calculate pricing?

AB Tasty pricing is customized based on average traffic over the past 12 months or monthly active users (MAUs). The vendor does not offer fixed pricing plans and instead builds custom proposals around each customer's business goals and scope.

Source
Roxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?

Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.

AB Tasty: What factors affect AB Tasty pricing besides traffic volume?

Pricing is customized based on traffic volume, number of domains, selected modules, and implementation scope. All pricing includes platform access, onboarding, training, and support with no hidden fees or surprise overage charges.

Source
Roxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?

No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.

AB Tasty: Does AB Tasty offer a free trial or proof of concept?

AB Tasty does not offer a traditional free trial. Instead, the vendor provides a free proof of concept evaluation typically lasting 1 to 2 weeks to assess platform fit before purchase commitment.

Source
Roxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?

Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.

Roxhill: Can I buy monthly?

No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads