Softwr
ArchiveSocial logo

ArchiveSocial

Social media archiving that captures public agency accounts as legally defensible open records

As of 31 August 2026, ArchiveSocial's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Captures every post, comment, edit and deletion on a government social media account in an authenticated, court admissible form. Softwr lists it under Government. ArchiveSocial is made by ArchiveSocial, part of CivicPlus, available on Web.

Overview

What ArchiveSocial does

ArchiveSocial records the social media activity of public agencies: posts, replies, comments from the public, direct messages where permitted, and crucially the edits and deletions that a periodic export would never capture. Records are stored with authentication metadata and can be searched and exported in response to a public records request or litigation hold. The company is based in Durham, North Carolina. The legal position is what creates the market. In the United States, an agency's social media posts are public records under state open records law and federal equivalents, and so are the public comments on them. Agencies have lost cases over deleted comments, and a deleted comment is precisely what a manual archiving process misses, because it is gone before anyone thinks to capture it. ArchiveSocial captures continuously through the platform APIs and preserves the record with a chain of custody, which is the difference between having an archive and having evidence. Screenshots and platform provided data exports fail on authentication and on deletion capture respectively. Ownership matters here for roadmap reasons. CivicPlus, the municipal website and communications vendor, acquired ArchiveSocial in 2021, so the product is now part of a broader local government suite and is sold alongside CivicPlus websites and communication tools. An agency that already runs CivicPlus will find procurement easier and bundling likely. An agency that deliberately avoids CivicPlus should know it is buying from them. Pricing is quoted, typically by number of archived accounts, and as with all government software the executed contracts are public and worth reading before negotiating.

What people use it for

  • A city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability
  • A police department that must produce social media records under an open records request
  • An agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshots
  • A communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archiving

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about ArchiveSocial.

  • Coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.
  • Pricing scales with the number of archived accounts, so an agency where every department runs its own page pays repeatedly for the same compliance obligation.
  • It archives rather than governs, so it will faithfully preserve a policy violation without preventing it, and agencies still need social media policy and training.
  • Since the 2021 CivicPlus acquisition the product is part of a municipal suite, so buyers avoiding that vendor for other reasons are still buying from them.
  • The value is entirely insurance shaped, which makes it a perennial target during budget cuts right up until the first records request it would have answered.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of ArchiveSocial

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • ArchiveSocial logo
    ArchiveSocial
    vs
    CivicPlus logo
    CivicPlus

    CivicPlus: The parent vendor, relevant if you want websites, communications and archiving from one contract

  • ArchiveSocial logo
    ArchiveSocial
    vs
    NextRequest logo
    NextRequest

    NextRequest: Better fit when the pressing problem is managing records requests rather than capturing social content

Pricing

What ArchiveSocial costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

ArchiveSocial

On request

  • Quoted annually, typically scaled by number of archived accounts
  • Additional accounts and platforms increase the subscription
  • Bundled pricing common for agencies already buying CivicPlus products
  • Agency contracts are public records and disclose comparable annual values

Capabilities

Features

  • Continuous capture

    Records posts and comments through platform APIs as they happen rather than on a schedule

  • Deletion and edit capture

    Preserves content that was removed or altered, which manual archiving misses

  • Authenticated records

    Stores metadata establishing chain of custody for admissibility

  • Records request search

    Searches the archive by keyword, account, date and author for open records responses

  • Litigation hold export

    Produces defensible exports in formats legal teams and courts accept

  • Multi platform coverage

    Archives across the major social networks an agency operates on

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Why not just export data from the platforms?

Platform exports do not reliably capture deleted or edited content and carry no chain of custody, which is what makes an archive usable as evidence.

Are public comments on our posts records?

In many United States jurisdictions yes, and deleted comments have been the subject of litigation against agencies.

Who owns ArchiveSocial?

CivicPlus, which acquired it in 2021 and sells it alongside its municipal website and communications products.

How is it priced?

By archived accounts, quoted rather than published. Comparable agency contracts are public records.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from ArchiveSocial

Best Government software for

Compare ArchiveSocial with

Other Government software

  • Public Records Request Management

    From $300/mo8 researched notes
  • Digital Government Experiences Platform

    From $500/mo8 researched notes
  • Resident sentiment analysis combining organic social listening with representative surveys

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Public sector HR suite covering civil service recruiting, onboarding, training and policy management

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Permitting, licensing and land management for local government, built natively on Salesforce

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Digital forms and workflow modules for small municipalities priced out of enterprise govtech

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Community data dashboards for local government and public health, prewired to federal datasets

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Digital Evidence and Records Management

    From $1,500/mo8 researched notes
  • San Francisco Open Data Portal

    Free plan4 researched notes
  • Meeting and Agenda Management

    From $400/mo5 researched notes
  • Government Request Management

    From $400/mo9 researched notes
  • Digital forms and workflow modules for small municipalities priced out of enterprise govtech

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Government Request Management

    From $400/mo9 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for ArchiveSocial, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on ArchiveSocial

Best Government software alternatives

GIS-centred enterprise asset management for public agencies, built around Esri ArcGIS

quote

GIS-centric public asset and work management, the product formerly sold as Cityworks

quote

Combined EAM and CMMS for utilities and municipalities with Esri GIS at the centre of the asset register

quote

Parks and recreation management for municipalities with published annual pricing and no per-seat fee

Per year, all inclusive with unlimited users

Cloud ERP built only for small and mid-sized local governments and utility districts

quote

Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract

Per year by department annual revenue

Compare ArchiveSocial with alternatives