Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

GNU Health vs WebPT

GNU Health logo

GNU Health

Healthcare

Free hospital and health information system from a small NGO, built on the Tryton framework

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
WebPT logo

WebPT

Healthcare

EHR and practice management for physical therapy

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only GNU Health has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: GNU Health development depends on GNU Solidario, a very small nonprofit funded by donations and training, so release cadence and long-term continuity are tied to a handful of people rather than to an engineering organisation.; WebPT no rate published on pricing page; vendor requires demo booking or sales contact for quotes
  • They diverge on capability: GNU Health covers Electronic medical record, WebPT covers Electronic Health Records.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which GNU Health and WebPT actually diverge.

Attributes where GNU Health and WebPT differ
AttributeGNU HealthWebPT
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsLinux, Web, Self-hostedCloud-based SaaS
FoundedUnknown2005

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in GNU Health

  • Electronic medical record
  • Hospital management
  • Laboratory information system
  • Social medicine modules
  • Tryton business modules
  • Health federation
  • ICD and standards support
  • Modular installation

Only in WebPT

  • Electronic Health Records
  • Scheduling
  • Documentation
  • Patient Portal
  • Analytics
  • Billing
  • Insurance
  • PECOS

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

GNU Health

  • A public hospital in a low-resource setting that cannot fund commercial EMR licensing and has in-house Linux capabilitynot WebPT
  • A ministry building a national health network where source code inspection and data sovereignty are policy requirementsnot WebPT
  • A university teaching health informatics that needs a complete, inspectable system rather than a vendor demonstrationnot WebPT
  • A community health programme that needs socioeconomic determinants recorded alongside clinical datanot WebPT

WebPT

  • Multi-location physical therapy practices needing comprehensive billing automation and insurance processingnot GNU Health
  • Rehabilitation therapy clinics requiring integrated AI-powered clinical documentationnot GNU Health

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

GNU Health

  • Development depends on GNU Solidario, a very small nonprofit funded by donations and training, so release cadence and long-term continuity are tied to a handful of people rather than to an engineering organisation.
  • It is built on Tryton, a framework few health IT staff know, so hiring or contracting people who can extend and maintain it is materially harder than for a mainstream stack.
  • Installation, upgrades and database administration assume Linux and Python competence, which puts the real cost on staffing rather than on licensing and defeats hospitals that lack that team.
  • The interface is functional rather than designed, and clinician acceptance is a genuine deployment risk compared with commercial systems that have invested heavily in usability.
  • Certification, regulatory conformance and interoperability testing that some jurisdictions demand of clinical systems are not provided by a vendor, so the adopting institution has to carry that work and that liability itself.

WebPT

  • No rate published on pricing page; vendor requires demo booking or sales contact for quotes
  • Specific pricing amounts not disclosed despite three pricing tiers being described

Pricing, plan by plan

GNU Health

Free
  • GNU HealthFree
    • GNU GPL licence
    • All modules included
    • No patient, bed or user limits
  • Support and training$undefined/year
    • Paid support and implementation from GNU Solidario
    • Training courses and certification
    • Quoted per institution

WebPT

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the WebPT review.

Which should you pick?

Choose GNU Health if

  • You need electronic medical record.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Web, Self-hosted.
  • You also want hospital management.
GNU Health review

Choose WebPT if

  • You need electronic health records.
  • You work on Cloud-based SaaS.
  • You also want scheduling.
WebPT review

Questions people ask

Is GNU Health or WebPT better?
Neither clearly leads. GNU Health starts at Free and WebPT at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, GNU Health or WebPT?
GNU Health has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GNU Health and On request for WebPT.
Does GNU Health or WebPT run on more platforms?
GNU Health runs on Linux, Web, Self-hosted. WebPT runs on Cloud-based SaaS.
Can I use GNU Health for free?
Yes. GNU Health has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. WebPT starts at On request.
What is GNU Health best used for?
GNU Health is most often used for a public hospital in a low-resource setting that cannot fund commercial emr licensing and has in-house linux capability, a ministry building a national health network where source code inspection and data sovereignty are policy requirements, a university teaching health informatics that needs a complete, inspectable system rather than a vendor demonstration, a community health programme that needs socioeconomic determinants recorded alongside clinical data. Of those, a public hospital in a low-resource setting that cannot fund commercial emr licensing and has in-house linux capability and a ministry building a national health network where source code inspection and data sovereignty are policy requirements are not what WebPT is typically brought in for.
What can GNU Health do that WebPT cannot?
GNU Health covers Electronic medical record, Hospital management, Laboratory information system, Social medicine modules. WebPT covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Documentation, Patient Portal.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

GNU Health: Who develops GNU Health?

GNU Solidario, a Spanish nonprofit NGO, as an official GNU package under the GPL.

WebPT: How much does WebPT cost?

WebPT pricing is customized based on your selected plan (Starter, Enhanced, or Ultimate) and any customizations your practice needs. Organizations must book a demo or contact sales to receive personalized pricing.

Source
GNU Health: Is there commercial support?

Yes, in a limited form, from GNU Solidario itself and a small number of implementers. It is not a vendor support organisation.

WebPT: What are the three WebPT pricing tiers?

WebPT offers Starter for small cash-pay practices, Enhanced for growing practices that accept insurance and need billing, and Ultimate for larger practices requiring customization and advanced reporting.

Source
GNU Health: What is it built on?

Tryton, a Python business application framework, which is where its accounting, stock and HR modules come from.

GNU Health: Is it suitable for a large hospital?

It is deployed in hospitals, but the deciding factor is whether you have internal Linux, Python and Tryton capability rather than the size of the institution.

Share

Related pages

More on GNU Health

More on WebPT

Keep looking

Other head to heads