Softwr

Travel · head to head

Redeam vs WebRezPro

Redeam logo

Redeam

Travel

Channel management and ticket redemption connecting attractions to resellers

From
On request
Rated
-
WebRezPro logo

WebRezPro

Travel

Cloud property management system for independent hotels, hostels, campgrounds and marinas

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Redeam pricing is not published, so budgeting requires a sales process and there is no way to sanity check the quote against a market rate.; WebRezPro no pricing is published at all, so evaluating WebRezPro means a sales conversation before you can compare it against Cloudbeds or Little Hotelier on cost.
  • They diverge on capability: Redeam covers Reseller connectivity, WebRezPro covers Mixed inventory types.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Redeam and WebRezPro actually diverge.

Attributes where Redeam and WebRezPro differ
AttributeRedeamWebRezPro
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Travel).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Redeam

  • Reseller connectivity
  • Ticket redemption
  • Reconciliation reporting
  • Rate and availability sync
  • Distribution API
  • Offline channel support

Only in WebRezPro

  • Mixed inventory types
  • Commission-free booking engine
  • Channel management
  • Automated night audit
  • Housekeeping and maintenance
  • Group and travel agent handling
  • Accounting export
  • Guest communications

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Redeam

  • An attraction with fifteen reseller partners including offline tour desks that reconciles voucher sales by spreadsheet every monthnot WebRezPro
  • A destination operator wanting one integration to reach many OTAs rather than building each connection separatelynot WebRezPro
  • A gate operation needing to scan and validate vouchers issued by any channel without knowing in advance which onenot WebRezPro
  • A business chasing revenue leakage from vouchers redeemed but never invoiced to the reselling partnernot WebRezPro

WebRezPro

  • A lodge running both cabins and tent sites that needs one reservation grid rather than two systemsnot Redeam
  • A hostel selling dorm beds individually alongside private roomsnot Redeam
  • A seasonal RV park that wants online booking without paying a per-reservation commissionnot Redeam
  • An independent hotel replacing an on-premise Windows PMS and wanting to drop the servernot Redeam

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Redeam

  • Pricing is not published, so budgeting requires a sales process and there is no way to sanity check the quote against a market rate.
  • It is not a booking engine, so you still pay for a reservation system alongside it and Redeam is an additional line rather than a replacement.
  • The value is proportional to the number of reseller relationships you have, so an operator with two OTA connections gains nothing over the channel manager in their existing platform.
  • Onboarding involves integrating both your reservation system and each partner, which is a project with dependencies on third parties you do not control.
  • The vendor is small relative to the OTAs it connects to, which means limited leverage when a major channel changes its API and connections need rework.

WebRezPro

  • No pricing is published at all, so evaluating WebRezPro means a sales conversation before you can compare it against Cloudbeds or Little Hotelier on cost.
  • The interface is dense and dated, and staff used to modern consumer software typically need structured training rather than picking it up on shift.
  • There is no meaningful native mobile app for staff, so housekeeping and maintenance workflows are done through a browser on a phone rather than a purpose-built app.
  • The third-party integration ecosystem is small, and requests for connections outside the existing list usually mean a custom development quote rather than a marketplace toggle.
  • Revenue management is limited to rate rules and yield triggers rather than genuine demand forecasting, so properties that want dynamic pricing need to add PriceLabs or RoomPriceGenie separately.

Pricing, plan by plan

Redeam

On request
  • Redeam$undefined/year
    • Reseller channel management
    • Ticket validation and redemption
    • Reconciliation reporting across partners

WebRezPro

On request
  • WebRezPro Cloud PMS$undefined/month
    • Quoted per unit per month with a monthly minimum
    • Rate varies by property type: hotel, hostel, campground or marina
    • Booking engine and channel manager included in the quote

Which should you pick?

Choose Redeam if

  • You need reseller connectivity.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want ticket redemption.

Choose WebRezPro if

  • You need mixed inventory types.
  • You also want commission-free booking engine.

Questions people ask

Is Redeam or WebRezPro better?
Neither clearly leads. Redeam starts at On request and WebRezPro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Redeam or WebRezPro?
Redeam starts at On request and WebRezPro at On request.
Does Redeam or WebRezPro run on more platforms?
Redeam runs on Web, API. WebRezPro runs on Web.
What is Redeam best used for?
Redeam is most often used for an attraction with fifteen reseller partners including offline tour desks that reconciles voucher sales by spreadsheet every month, a destination operator wanting one integration to reach many otas rather than building each connection separately, a gate operation needing to scan and validate vouchers issued by any channel without knowing in advance which one, a business chasing revenue leakage from vouchers redeemed but never invoiced to the reselling partner. Of those, an attraction with fifteen reseller partners including offline tour desks that reconciles voucher sales by spreadsheet every month and a destination operator wanting one integration to reach many otas rather than building each connection separately are not what WebRezPro is typically brought in for.
What can Redeam do that WebRezPro cannot?
Redeam covers Reseller connectivity, Ticket redemption, Reconciliation reporting, Rate and availability sync. WebRezPro covers Mixed inventory types, Commission-free booking engine, Channel management, Automated night audit.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Redeam: Is Redeam a booking system?

No. It is connectivity, redemption and reconciliation between your reservation system and your resellers.

WebRezPro: How much does WebRezPro cost?

It is quoted, not published. The model is per unit per month with a monthly minimum, and the per-unit rate differs for hotel rooms, hostel beds and campsites.

Redeam: What does it cost?

Not published. Expect quoting by transaction volume or number of connections.

WebRezPro: Does it charge commission on direct bookings?

No. The booking engine is commission-free; you pay the subscription and your own card processing rates.

Redeam: Do I still need a booking platform?

Yes. Redeam sits alongside FareHarbor, Bokun or your own system rather than replacing it.

WebRezPro: Can it run a campground and a hotel together?

Yes. Mixed inventory in one property is one of the reasons operators choose it over a rooms-only PMS.

Redeam: Does it handle offline resellers?

Yes, including pre-issued and paper vouchers from tour desks and agencies, which is the main reason operators buy it.

WebRezPro: Is there an open API?

There is an API for partner integrations, but it is not self-service in the way Mews or Apaleo publish theirs, and access is arranged through the vendor.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads