Cybersecurity · head to head
Ping Identity vs Resolver

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ping Identity and Resolver actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ping Identity | Resolver |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Resolver
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Resolver
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Resolver
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Ping Identity
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Ping Identity
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Ping Identity
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Ping Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Ping Identity or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ping Identity or Resolver?
- Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Resolver at On request.
- Does Ping Identity or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Ping Identity best used for?
- Ping Identity is most often used for a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere, an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale, an enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendors, an existing forgerock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under ping ownership. Of those, a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere and an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Ping Identity do that Resolver cannot?
- Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs LogicManager
- Ping Identity vs Diligent
- Ping Identity vs MetricStream
- Ping Identity vs NICE Actimize
- Ping Identity vs Omada Identity
- Ping Identity vs Sardine
- Ping Identity vs Silent Eight
- Ping Identity vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Ping Identity vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Ping Identity vs OneTrust
- Ping Identity vs Trulioo
- Ping Identity vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Ping Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Ping Identity vs Falco
- Ping Identity vs Fenergo
- Ping Identity vs Google Authenticator
- Ping Identity vs Grype
- Resolver vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Resolver vs Frontegg
- Resolver vs Speakeasy
- Resolver vs Akeyless
- Resolver vs authentik
- Resolver vs Logto
- Resolver vs Authelia
- Resolver vs Transmit Security
- Resolver vs Delinea
- Resolver vs Genetec Security Center
- Resolver vs VMware Carbon Black
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Yoti
- Resolver vs Avast One
- Resolver vs Chainguard
- Resolver vs Cosign
- Resolver vs CyberGhost VPN
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
