Cybersecurity · head to head
LogicManager vs Ping Identity

LogicManager
Cybersecurity
Enterprise risk management priced as a flat fee with unlimited users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LogicManager the flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LogicManager and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | LogicManager | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LogicManager
- Risk taxonomy
- Unlimited users
- Risk assessments
- Third-party risk
- Internal audit
- Policy management
- Incident management
- Advisory support
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LogicManager
- A mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat eachnot Ping Identity
- A risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affectnot Ping Identity
- An organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trailnot Ping Identity
- A company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicatednot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot LogicManager
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot LogicManager
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot LogicManager
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot LogicManager
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LogicManager
- The flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.
- Configuration depth means the taxonomy has to be designed properly before rollout, and organisations that skip that step end up with a structure that cannot answer the linkage questions the tool exists to answer.
- Reporting and dashboarding are functional rather than flexible, and teams wanting bespoke board reporting commonly export to Power BI, which reintroduces the manual step they were removing.
- Quantitative risk modelling is limited compared with specialist tools, so organisations needing Monte Carlo style loss simulation will need something else alongside it.
- The user interface is dated relative to newer compliance automation tools, and infrequent business users often need repeat training, which erodes the participation benefit that unlimited licensing is supposed to deliver.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
LogicManager
On request- LogicManager Platform$undefined/year
- Fixed annual fee, unlimited users
- Risk, audit, vendor, policy and incident modules
- Advisory analyst support included
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is LogicManager or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. LogicManager starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LogicManager or Ping Identity?
- LogicManager starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does LogicManager or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- LogicManager runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is LogicManager best used for?
- LogicManager is most often used for a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each, a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect, an organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trail, a company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicated. Of those, a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each and a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can LogicManager do that Ping Identity cannot?
- LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Unlimited users, Risk assessments, Third-party risk. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LogicManager: Is LogicManager really unlimited users?
Yes. It licences on a fixed annual fee covering the organisation rather than per seat, which is the main reason mid-market buyers pick it.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
LogicManager: What does it cost?
Not published. Mid-market ERM platforms of this class typically sit in the low tens of thousands of dollars a year, quoted by scope.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
LogicManager: Is it a compliance automation tool like Drata?
No. It is enterprise risk management with audit and vendor risk, not continuous control monitoring for SOC 2 evidence collection.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
LogicManager: How long does implementation take?
Weeks to a few months, far shorter than the enterprise GRC suites, provided the risk taxonomy is agreed up front.
Related pages
More on LogicManager
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- LogicManager vs Resolver
- LogicManager vs Diligent
- LogicManager vs MetricStream
- LogicManager vs Drata
- LogicManager vs Silent Eight
- LogicManager vs NICE Actimize
- LogicManager vs Rhombus Systems
- LogicManager vs Trulioo
- LogicManager vs Trend Micro Vision One
- LogicManager vs IBM QRadar
- LogicManager vs Motorola Vigilant
- LogicManager vs VMware Carbon Black
- LogicManager vs Quantexa
- LogicManager vs Termly
- LogicManager vs Transcend
- LogicManager vs WireGuard
- LogicManager vs Akeyless
- LogicManager vs DataGrail
- LogicManager vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- LogicManager vs Frontegg
- LogicManager vs Speakeasy
- LogicManager vs authentik
- LogicManager vs Logto
- LogicManager vs Authelia
- LogicManager vs Transmit Security
- LogicManager vs Delinea
- LogicManager vs Genetec Security Center
- LogicManager vs Yoti
- LogicManager vs Avast One
- LogicManager vs Chainguard
- LogicManager vs Cosign
- LogicManager vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Resolver
- Ping Identity vs Diligent
- Ping Identity vs MetricStream
- Ping Identity vs Drata
- Ping Identity vs Silent Eight
- Ping Identity vs NICE Actimize
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Trulioo
- Ping Identity vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Ping Identity vs IBM QRadar
- Ping Identity vs Motorola Vigilant
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Quantexa
- Ping Identity vs Termly
- Ping Identity vs Transcend
- Ping Identity vs WireGuard
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs DataGrail
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
