Cybersecurity · head to head
Resolver vs Speakeasy
Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.; Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Resolver covers Incident management, Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Resolver and Speakeasy actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Speakeasy
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Speakeasy
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Speakeasy
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Speakeasy
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Resolver
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Resolver
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Resolver
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Resolver
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Pricing, plan by plan
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Resolver or Speakeasy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Resolver starts at On request and Speakeasy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Resolver or Speakeasy?
- Resolver starts at On request and Speakeasy at On request.
- Does Resolver or Speakeasy run on more platforms?
- Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android. Speakeasy runs on web, api.
- What is Resolver best used for?
- Resolver is most often used for a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling, a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email, a university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single record, an organisation that already retains kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platform. Of those, a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling and a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email are not what Speakeasy is typically brought in for.
- What can Resolver do that Speakeasy cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit. Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Speakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Speakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
- Resolver vs Doppler
- Resolver vs Akeyless
- Resolver vs Tenable
- Resolver vs Endor Labs
- Resolver vs Frontegg
- Resolver vs Netwrix
- Resolver vs Securiti
- Resolver vs Qualys VMDR
- Resolver vs Transcend
- Resolver vs Saviynt
- Resolver vs Arnica
- Resolver vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Resolver vs TunnelBear
- Resolver vs Vanta
- Resolver vs Acunetix
- Resolver vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs LogicManager
- Speakeasy vs Diligent
- Speakeasy vs MetricStream
- Speakeasy vs NICE Actimize
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Sardine
- Speakeasy vs Silent Eight
- Speakeasy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Speakeasy vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Speakeasy vs OneTrust
- Speakeasy vs Rhombus Systems
- Speakeasy vs Trulioo
- Speakeasy vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Speakeasy vs ExpressVPN
- Speakeasy vs Falco
- Speakeasy vs Fenergo
- Speakeasy vs Google Authenticator
- Speakeasy vs Grype
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs Endor Labs
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido