Cybersecurity · head to head
Akeyless vs Resolver

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Akeyless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akeyless pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Akeyless covers Secrets management, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akeyless and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akeyless
- Secrets management
- Machine identity
- AI agent identity
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Multi-vault governance
- Encryption and KMS
- Password manager
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akeyless
- Securing AI agents with dedicated identity trackingnot Resolver
- Managing machine-to-machine credentials at scalenot Resolver
- Automating PKI and certificate lifecyclenot Resolver
- Implementing just-in-time privileged accessnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Akeyless
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Akeyless
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Akeyless
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Akeyless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akeyless
- Pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation
- Free tier is very limited with restricted access
- No transparent pricing published for enterprise features
- Pricing model varies significantly by product module
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akeyless
Free- FreeFree
- Limited feature access
- Restricted usage quotas
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing based on usage
- Unlimited resource quotas
- Full feature access
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Akeyless if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises.
- You also want machine identity.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Akeyless or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akeyless starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akeyless or Resolver?
- Akeyless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Akeyless and On request for Resolver.
- Does Akeyless or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Akeyless runs on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Akeyless for free?
- Yes. Akeyless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Akeyless best used for?
- Akeyless is most often used for securing ai agents with dedicated identity tracking, managing machine-to-machine credentials at scale, automating pki and certificate lifecycle, implementing just-in-time privileged access. Of those, securing ai agents with dedicated identity tracking and managing machine-to-machine credentials at scale are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Akeyless do that Resolver cannot?
- Akeyless covers Secrets management, Machine identity, AI agent identity, Certificate management. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akeyless: What pricing model does Akeyless use?
Akeyless uses usage-based pricing units that vary by product. For example, Secrets Management is priced by clients, Certificate Management by managed certificates, Encryption by transactions, and PAM by users. Contact sales for a custom quote.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Akeyless: Does Akeyless support hybrid deployment?
Yes, Akeyless offers Pure SaaS cloud-managed deployment and Hybrid SaaS with on-premise gateways and zero-knowledge encryption for sensitive environments.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Akeyless: How does Akeyless handle AI agent identities?
Akeyless provides dedicated AI agent identity tracking with runtime access control, allowing organizations to manage AI agent access separately from human and machine identities.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akeyless vs Infisical
- Akeyless vs Doppler
- Akeyless vs HashiCorp Vault
- Akeyless vs Frontegg
- Akeyless vs Endor Labs
- Akeyless vs Aikido
- Akeyless vs Speakeasy
- Akeyless vs Keeper Password Manager
- Akeyless vs Delinea
- Akeyless vs Chainguard
- Akeyless vs Tenable
- Akeyless vs Sticky Password
- Akeyless vs Grype
- Akeyless vs Hanwha Vision
- Akeyless vs Idira
- Akeyless vs IVPN
- Akeyless vs Logto
- Akeyless vs Malwarebytes
- Akeyless vs LogicManager
- Akeyless vs Diligent
- Akeyless vs MetricStream
- Akeyless vs NICE Actimize
- Akeyless vs Omada Identity
- Akeyless vs Sardine
- Akeyless vs Silent Eight
- Akeyless vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Akeyless vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Akeyless vs OneTrust
- Akeyless vs Rhombus Systems
- Akeyless vs Trulioo
- Akeyless vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Akeyless vs ExpressVPN
- Akeyless vs Falco
- Akeyless vs Fenergo
- Akeyless vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Infisical
- Resolver vs Doppler
- Resolver vs HashiCorp Vault
- Resolver vs Frontegg
- Resolver vs Endor Labs
- Resolver vs Aikido
- Resolver vs Speakeasy
- Resolver vs Keeper Password Manager
- Resolver vs Delinea
- Resolver vs Chainguard
- Resolver vs Tenable
- Resolver vs Sticky Password
- Resolver vs Grype
- Resolver vs Hanwha Vision
- Resolver vs Idira
- Resolver vs IVPN
- Resolver vs Logto
- Resolver vs Malwarebytes
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator

