Softwr

Accounting · head to head

Moss vs RoomRaccoon

Moss logo

Moss

Accounting

European corporate cards, invoice management and accounting automation

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
RoomRaccoon logo

RoomRaccoon

Travel

All-in-one PMS, channel manager and booking engine for independent European hotels

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Moss pricing is not published anywhere, so the only way to compare Moss with Pleo or Payhawk is to run parallel sales processes and reveal your spend volume to all of them.; RoomRaccoon revenue and upselling functionality is gated behind higher tiers, so the advertised entry price is rarely what a property that wants automated pricing actually pays.
  • They diverge on capability: Moss covers Corporate credit cards, RoomRaccoon covers Property management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Moss and RoomRaccoon actually diverge.

Attributes where Moss and RoomRaccoon differ
AttributeMossRoomRaccoon
CategoryAccountingTravel

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Moss

  • Corporate credit cards
  • Invoice management
  • Employee reimbursements
  • DATEV export
  • Accounting preparation
  • Budgets and teams
  • Receipt matching
  • Multi entity

Only in RoomRaccoon

  • Property management
  • Channel manager
  • Booking engine
  • RaccoonPay
  • RaccoonRev
  • Upselling

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Moss

  • A German company whose tax adviser works in DATEV and needs card and invoice data exported without manual rekeyingnot RoomRaccoon
  • A finance team replacing pre funded prepaid cards with a monthly settled credit limit to protect working capitalnot RoomRaccoon
  • A business consolidating supplier invoice approval and card spend into one approval chainnot RoomRaccoon
  • A group with entities in Germany, the Netherlands and Spain wanting one spend view across themnot RoomRaccoon

RoomRaccoon

  • A 20 to 40 room independent hotel replacing separate PMS, channel manager and booking engine contractsnot Moss
  • A European B and B that needs local tourist tax handling and regional payment methods out of the boxnot Moss
  • A South African guesthouse group wanting one system with local OTA coverage and support hoursnot Moss

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Moss

  • Pricing is not published anywhere, so the only way to compare Moss with Pleo or Payhawk is to run parallel sales processes and reveal your spend volume to all of them.
  • Card limits are underwritten, so early stage companies and businesses with thin filed accounts are routinely offered limits well below what they need and the limit can be reduced on review.
  • Coverage is European and weighted to DACH, so any group with United States or Asian entities has to run a second card programme and reconcile two systems.
  • Invoice management is capable but not a full procurement or purchase order system, so businesses needing three way matching against goods receipts will find it thin.
  • As a non bank the credit product depends on partner banks and funding lines, which means the terms behind your limit are set by a party you do not contract with and can change without you being the cause.

RoomRaccoon

  • Revenue and upselling functionality is gated behind higher tiers, so the advertised entry price is rarely what a property that wants automated pricing actually pays.
  • The integration catalogue is short compared with the larger cloud platforms, and a property with an existing spa, POS or CRM preference may find no connector exists.
  • Multi-property management is workable but shallow, so a group beyond a handful of hotels will hit reporting and consolidated inventory limits.
  • Support hours follow European and South African time zones, which leaves properties in the Americas and Asia Pacific waiting overnight for anything beyond first-line help.
  • Because distribution, payments and the PMS come from one vendor, a fault or a price rise in any one of them cannot be answered by switching that component alone.

Pricing, plan by plan

Moss

On request
  • Moss$undefined/year
    • Platform fee plus per user components, quoted per customer
    • Card limits set by underwriting against company financials
    • DATEV export and accounting preparation included in core plans

RoomRaccoon

On request
  • RoomRaccoon$undefined/year
    • Tiered subscription scaled by number of rooms
    • Higher tiers unlock dynamic pricing and upselling modules
    • Payment processing charged per transaction

Which should you pick?

Choose Moss if

  • You need corporate credit cards.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want invoice management.
Moss review

Choose RoomRaccoon if

  • You need property management.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want channel manager.
RoomRaccoon review

Questions people ask

Is Moss or RoomRaccoon better?
Neither clearly leads. Moss starts at On request and RoomRaccoon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Moss or RoomRaccoon?
Moss starts at On request and RoomRaccoon at On request.
Does Moss or RoomRaccoon run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Moss best used for?
Moss is most often used for a german company whose tax adviser works in datev and needs card and invoice data exported without manual rekeying, a finance team replacing pre funded prepaid cards with a monthly settled credit limit to protect working capital, a business consolidating supplier invoice approval and card spend into one approval chain, a group with entities in germany, the netherlands and spain wanting one spend view across them. Of those, a german company whose tax adviser works in datev and needs card and invoice data exported without manual rekeying and a finance team replacing pre funded prepaid cards with a monthly settled credit limit to protect working capital are not what RoomRaccoon is typically brought in for.
What can Moss do that RoomRaccoon cannot?
Moss covers Corporate credit cards, Invoice management, Employee reimbursements, DATEV export. RoomRaccoon covers Property management, Channel manager, Booking engine, RaccoonPay.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Moss: Does Moss issue credit or prepaid cards?

Credit in its core German offer, settled monthly against an underwritten limit, rather than requiring a pre funded balance.

RoomRaccoon: Does RoomRaccoon charge commission on direct bookings?

No. The booking engine is included in the subscription and direct reservations carry no commission, though card processing fees still apply.

Moss: Is DATEV export genuinely automatic?

Yes, bookings and receipt images export in DATEV format, which is the main reason German finance teams choose it over non German tools.

RoomRaccoon: Is it suitable for a hotel with 150 rooms?

It will run, but the product is designed around independents up to roughly 60 rooms and larger properties will find reporting and group handling thin.

Moss: Does Moss work outside Europe?

Not meaningfully. Coverage centres on Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, the UK and Spain, so global groups need a second provider.

RoomRaccoon: Can it be used as a channel manager only?

Not really. The value is in the bundle, and buying it purely for distribution costs more than a dedicated channel manager.

RoomRaccoon: Which regions does it support best?

Europe first, then South Africa. Coverage in North America and Asia is lighter on local OTAs and payment methods.

Share

Related pages

More on Moss

More on RoomRaccoon

Keep looking

Other head to heads