Healthcare · head to head
Sectra vs Visage Imaging

Sectra
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sectra sectra does not make scanners, so it cannot cross-subsidise software against modality hardware the way an integrated manufacturer can, and it often loses on headline price in a bundled tender.; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: Sectra covers Sectra IDS7, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sectra and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sectra | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sectra
- Sectra IDS7
- Digital pathology module
- Sectra VNA
- Sectra UniView
- Image Exchange Portal
- Sectra Amplifier
- Breast imaging workflow
- Sectra One Cloud
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sectra
- A hospital group digitising histopathology that does not want a second image archive and a second integration project alongside radiologynot Visage Imaging
- A regional health service replacing several departmental PACS with one archive and one clinician viewernot Visage Imaging
- An imaging provider moving off a capital refresh cycle to a cloud subscription with predictable annual costnot Visage Imaging
- A trust that needs to send and receive studies with neighbouring organisations routinely, where the Image Exchange Portal is already the regional normnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Sectra
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Sectra
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Sectra
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Sectra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sectra
- Sectra does not make scanners, so it cannot cross-subsidise software against modality hardware the way an integrated manufacturer can, and it often loses on headline price in a bundled tender.
- Diagnostic AI is not built in house; Amplifier orchestrates third party algorithms, so the algorithms themselves need separate licences, separate clinical validation and separate information governance sign off.
- Sectra One Cloud is priced against a committed annual study volume, and organisations whose imaging activity grows faster than forecast meet overage charges partway through the term.
- The pathology module assumes you have already solved slide scanning and laboratory workflow, which is the larger and more expensive part of digitising histopathology and is not in Sectra scope.
- Depth of Epic and Oracle Health integration varies by region and by which modules you buy, so a reference site in Sweden is a weak predictor of what integration will cost a United States buyer.
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sectra
On request- Sectra Enterprise Imaging$undefined/year
- Perpetual licence plus annual maintenance, or Sectra One Cloud subscription
- Priced on committed annual study volume and modules selected
- Pathology, cardiology and ophthalmology licensed as separate modules
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Sectra if
- You need sectra ids7.
- You work on Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want digital pathology module.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Sectra or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sectra starts at On request and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sectra or Visage Imaging?
- Sectra starts at On request and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does Sectra or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Sectra runs on Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is Sectra best used for?
- Sectra is most often used for a hospital group digitising histopathology that does not want a second image archive and a second integration project alongside radiology, a regional health service replacing several departmental pacs with one archive and one clinician viewer, an imaging provider moving off a capital refresh cycle to a cloud subscription with predictable annual cost, a trust that needs to send and receive studies with neighbouring organisations routinely, where the image exchange portal is already the regional norm. Of those, a hospital group digitising histopathology that does not want a second image archive and a second integration project alongside radiology and a regional health service replacing several departmental pacs with one archive and one clinician viewer are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Sectra do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Sectra covers Sectra IDS7, Digital pathology module, Sectra VNA, Sectra UniView. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sectra: Does Sectra include diagnostic AI?
No. Sectra Amplifier is a marketplace and orchestration layer for third party algorithms, each licensed and validated separately.
Visage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Sectra: Is pathology really on the same platform as radiology?
Yes, the pathology module uses the same archive and workflow engine, which is the main reason buyers digitising histopathology shortlist Sectra.
Visage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Sectra: How is Sectra One Cloud priced?
On committed annual study volume plus the modules selected, as a subscription rather than a capital purchase. The vendor does not publish rates.
Visage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Sectra: Is Sectra CE marked and FDA cleared?
The diagnostic viewing software carries CE marking under the medical device regulation and FDA 510(k) clearance for diagnostic interpretation, but the exact cleared indications differ per module and per market, so confirm for pathology specifically.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Sectra vs Rad AI
- Sectra vs Gleamer
- Sectra vs Paige
- Sectra vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Sectra vs Annalise.ai
- Sectra vs Epic Systems
- Sectra vs Cerner
- Sectra vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Sectra vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Sectra vs Ambra Health
- Sectra vs PathAI
- Sectra vs Quantum Health
- Sectra vs Techcyte
- Sectra vs Therapixel
- Sectra vs TherapyNotes
- Sectra vs Zocdoc
- Sectra vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Sectra vs OpenMRS
- Sectra vs Signant Health
- Sectra vs Aidoc
- Sectra vs Clue
- Sectra vs Allscripts
- Sectra vs Dentrix
- Sectra vs DHIS2
- Sectra vs Flo
- Sectra vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Paige
- Visage Imaging vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs PathAI
- Visage Imaging vs Quantum Health
- Visage Imaging vs Techcyte
- Visage Imaging vs Therapixel
- Visage Imaging vs TherapyNotes
- Visage Imaging vs Zocdoc
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
