Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs Quartix

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Quartix
Fleet Management
Deliberately narrow vehicle tracking from a listed UK vendor that publishes its prices
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; Quartix video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- They diverge on capability: IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, Quartix covers Live tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and Quartix actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | Quartix |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per vehicle per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Quartix
- Live tracking
- Driving style scoring
- Timesheet reporting
- Geofences
- Driver identification
- Published pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot Quartix
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot Quartix
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot Quartix
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot Quartix
Quartix
- A UK or French van fleet that wants tracking and timesheet evidence without a discovery call and a three-year commitmentnot IndoorAtlas
- A finance manager who needs to compare telematics costs on published numbers rather than negotiated quotesnot IndoorAtlas
- An operator disputing employee hours or customer claims about arrival times who needs a defensible site attendance recordnot IndoorAtlas
- A small fleet whose insurer offers a discount for driving style monitoring but who does not need cameras or compliance toolingnot IndoorAtlas
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Quartix
- Video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- There is no maintenance, work order or parts management, so servicing schedules stay in whatever spreadsheet or garage system the fleet already runs.
- US hours of service and wider DOT compliance are not the focus, which rules Quartix out for regulated interstate commercial operations.
- The standard tracker is hardwired rather than a plug-in device, so installation means booking vehicles in, which adds cost and downtime that no-contract plug-in competitors avoid.
- The API and integration list are short, so feeding tracking data into payroll, job costing or an ERP tends to mean scheduled exports rather than a supported connector.
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Quartix
On request- Quartix$undefined/month
- List pricing published openly, with rates varying by contract length
- Tracking hardware included in the subscription rather than bought separately
- One-year terms available alongside longer discounted options
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Quartix if
- You need live tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want driving style scoring.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or Quartix better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Quartix at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or Quartix?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IndoorAtlas and On request for Quartix.
- Does IndoorAtlas or Quartix run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. Quartix runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Quartix starts at On request.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what Quartix is typically brought in for.
- What can IndoorAtlas do that Quartix cannot?
- IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Quartix covers Live tracking, Driving style scoring, Timesheet reporting, Geofences.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceQuartix: Why is Quartix cheaper than the big platforms?
Because it does less. There is no camera ecosystem, no compliance suite and no marketplace to fund. If you only need tracking, you are not subsidising features you will not use.
IndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceQuartix: Do I have to sign for three years?
No. Shorter terms are offered, priced higher per month than the longer options. The rates are published, so the trade-off is visible before you talk to anyone.
IndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceQuartix: Is the hardware mine?
The tracking unit is supplied as part of the subscription rather than sold to you. Check the return and replacement terms if you plan to leave or dispose of vehicles.
IndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Geotab
- IndoorAtlas vs Verizon Connect
- IndoorAtlas vs Azuga
- IndoorAtlas vs CalAmp
- IndoorAtlas vs GPS Trackit
- IndoorAtlas vs NexTraq
- IndoorAtlas vs Motive
- IndoorAtlas vs Lytx
- IndoorAtlas vs Whip Around
- IndoorAtlas vs Zonar Systems
- IndoorAtlas vs Samsara
- IndoorAtlas vs Omnitracs
- IndoorAtlas vs Ridecell
- IndoorAtlas vs Uptake
- IndoorAtlas vs Webfleet
- Quartix vs Mappedin
- Quartix vs Esri ArcGIS
- Quartix vs CesiumJS
- Quartix vs SW Maps
- Quartix vs Felt
- Quartix vs Leica Infinity
- Quartix vs Navmii GPS
- Quartix vs Transit
- Quartix vs Mapbox
- Quartix vs Google Maps Platform
- Quartix vs LocationIQ
- Quartix vs Lonboard
- Quartix vs Mapillary
- Quartix vs MapQuest
- Quartix vs MAPS.ME
- Quartix vs Mapzen
- Quartix vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Quartix vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Quartix vs Geotab
- Quartix vs Verizon Connect
- Quartix vs Azuga
- Quartix vs CalAmp
- Quartix vs GPS Trackit
- Quartix vs NexTraq
- Quartix vs Motive
- Quartix vs Lytx
- Quartix vs Whip Around
- Quartix vs Zonar Systems
- Quartix vs Samsara
- Quartix vs Omnitracs
- Quartix vs Ridecell
- Quartix vs Uptake
- Quartix vs Webfleet
