Field Service · head to head
Fracttal One vs Properly
Fracttal One
Field Service
Cloud maintenance management with strong Spanish and Portuguese language support
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Properly
Field Service
Photo-verified turnover checklists and cleaner coordination for short-term rentals
- From
- $12.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fracttal One pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared against MaintainX or Limble without a sales conversation; Properly properly solves only the turnover, so it is an additional per-property cost on top of a PMS that already claims to schedule cleaning, and the overlap is real.
- They diverge on capability: Fracttal One covers Work order management, Properly covers Photo-verified checklists.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fracttal One and Properly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fracttal One | Properly |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $12.99/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per property per month |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Field Service).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fracttal One
- Work order management
- Preventive and predictive
- IoT condition monitoring
- Inventory and purchasing
- Multi-language and multi-currency
- Dashboards and KPIs
Only in Properly
- Photo-verified checklists
- Automatic scheduling
- Offline mode
- Multi-language support
- Cleaner marketplace
- Real-time inspection
- Damage documentation
- Problem reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fracttal One
- Maintenance operations in Latin America and Spain needing native-language supportnot Properly
- Multinationals standardising maintenance across Spanish and Portuguese speaking sitesnot Properly
- Plants adding IoT sensors to move beyond calendar-based maintenancenot Properly
- Organisations wanting regional implementation partners rather than remote onboardingnot Properly
Properly
- A manager with forty units using contract cleaners who cannot personally inspect turnoversnot Fracttal One
- An owner in a different country from the property who needs evidence a clean actually happenednot Fracttal One
- A portfolio pursuing damage claims that require dated before and after photographsnot Fracttal One
- An operation onboarding new cleaning crews quickly with visual instructions rather than written onesnot Fracttal One
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fracttal One
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared against MaintainX or Limble without a sales conversation
- English-language documentation and community are thinner than the Spanish equivalents, which reverses the usual problem
- Smaller partner and integration ecosystem than the US-headquartered competitors
- Less recognised on English-language shortlists, which can make internal approval harder in multinational procurement
- The IoT capability requires sensor investment to be worth anything, and the business case for that is separate from the CMMS decision
Properly
- Properly solves only the turnover, so it is an additional per-property cost on top of a PMS that already claims to schedule cleaning, and the overlap is real.
- The photo requirement adds time to every clean, and cleaners paid per turnover often resist it, which becomes a negotiation about rates rather than a software rollout.
- Real-time inspection is billed at five dollars per inspection rather than included, so using it on every changeover materially changes the per-property cost.
- The managed services tiers are priced an order of magnitude above the software, and operators sometimes discover the pitch is really about those rather than the app.
- The cleaner marketplace has depth only in established North American destinations, and in thinner markets a missed turnover still means calling round yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fracttal One
On request- Starter$undefined/user/month
- Work orders
- Asset management
- Mobile app
- Pro$undefined/user/month
- Preventive maintenance
- Inventory
- Purchasing
- Enterprise$undefined/user/month
- IoT and condition monitoring
- API access
- SSO
Properly
$12.99/month- Platform$12.99/month
- Per property per month, tiered down toward 5 USD at volume
- Photo checklists and automatic scheduling
- Cleaner marketplace access
- Real-Time Inspection$undefined/month
- Charged at 5 USD per inspection, not per month
- Remote human review of a completed turnover
- Used selectively rather than on every clean
- Cohost Pro$119/month
- Per active property per month
- Managed cohosting service rather than software alone
- Includes guest and operational coverage
- Guest Support Plus$149/month
- Per listing per month
- Outsourced guest communication
- Sold alongside the platform
Which should you pick?
Choose Fracttal One if
- You need work order management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want preventive and predictive.
Choose Properly if
- You need photo-verified checklists.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want automatic scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Fracttal One or Properly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fracttal One starts at On request and Properly at $12.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fracttal One or Properly?
- Fracttal One starts at On request and Properly at $12.99/month.
- Does Fracttal One or Properly run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Fracttal One best used for?
- Fracttal One is most often used for maintenance operations in latin america and spain needing native-language support, multinationals standardising maintenance across spanish and portuguese speaking sites, plants adding iot sensors to move beyond calendar-based maintenance, organisations wanting regional implementation partners rather than remote onboarding. Of those, maintenance operations in latin america and spain needing native-language support and multinationals standardising maintenance across spanish and portuguese speaking sites are not what Properly is typically brought in for.
- What can Fracttal One do that Properly cannot?
- Fracttal One covers Work order management, Preventive and predictive, IoT condition monitoring, Inventory and purchasing. Properly covers Photo-verified checklists, Automatic scheduling, Offline mode, Multi-language support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fracttal One: Where is Fracttal strongest?
Latin America and Spain. Native Spanish and Portuguese support, regional implementation partners and local invoicing decide more maintenance software purchases in those markets than feature comparisons do.
Properly: What does Properly actually cost per property?
The platform starts at 12.99 US dollars per property per month, falling toward 5 dollars at higher volumes. Remote inspections cost 5 dollars each on top.
Fracttal One: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is quoted by tier and region, which is normal for this market but makes direct comparison harder.
Properly: Does it replace my property management system?
No. It connects to one and covers turnovers only. Distribution, guest messaging and accounting stay elsewhere.
Fracttal One: Does it do predictive maintenance?
It supports sensor-triggered maintenance through its IoT layer. Whether that constitutes predictive maintenance depends on the sensors and the analysis behind them, not on the CMMS.
Properly: Will cleaners actually use it?
They will if you require it, but the mandatory photo steps lengthen each clean and often need to be reflected in what you pay per turnover.
Fracttal One: Is it a good choice for a US-only operation?
Usually not the obvious one. MaintainX, UpKeep and Limble have published pricing, larger English-language ecosystems and more local reference customers.
Properly: Does it help with damage claims?
Yes. Timestamped before and after photographs from the checklist are the main evidence operators use when claiming against a guest.
Fracttal One: How does it compare to the US mid-market CMMS?
Functionally comparable. The decision is normally about language, support hours and local presence rather than about features.
Related pages
More on Fracttal One
Other head to heads
- Fracttal One vs MaintainX
- Fracttal One vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Fracttal One vs Tractian
- Fracttal One vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Fracttal One vs FaciliWorks
- Fracttal One vs Redlist
- Fracttal One vs Commusoft
- Fracttal One vs Joblogic
- Fracttal One vs Vonigo
- Fracttal One vs Jobber
- Fracttal One vs ServiceTitan
- Fracttal One vs Housecall Pro
- Fracttal One vs FieldEdge
- Fracttal One vs Percepto
- Fracttal One vs Repsly
- Fracttal One vs ResortCleaning
- Fracttal One vs Skedulo
- Fracttal One vs Synchroteam
- Properly vs MaintainX
- Properly vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Properly vs Tractian
- Properly vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Properly vs FaciliWorks
- Properly vs Redlist
- Properly vs Commusoft
- Properly vs Joblogic
- Properly vs Vonigo
- Properly vs Jobber
- Properly vs ServiceTitan
- Properly vs Housecall Pro
- Properly vs FieldEdge
- Properly vs Percepto
- Properly vs Repsly
- Properly vs ResortCleaning
- Properly vs Skedulo
- Properly vs Synchroteam