Field Service · head to head
AroFlo vs Zuper

AroFlo
Field Service
Job management for Australian and New Zealand trade contractors, now part of the Simpro Group
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Zuper
Field Service
Field service management with an API-first architecture and heavy integration surface
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AroFlo aroFlo, Simpro, BigChange and ClockShark now share one owner in Simpro Group, so a shortlist that compares them is comparing products with a single roadmap owner and no competitive pressure between them to keep prices down.; Zuper zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: AroFlo covers Mobile job cards, Zuper covers Work order management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AroFlo and Zuper actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Field Service).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AroFlo
- Mobile job cards
- Supplier catalogue feeds
- Compliance and safety forms
- Scheduling and dispatch
- Project management
- Asset and maintenance registers
- Accounting sync
- Inventory and stock control
Only in Zuper
- Work order management
- Intelligent dispatch
- Technician mobile
- Inventory
- Job costing
- Open API and webhooks
- AI agents
- Customer portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AroFlo
- An Australian electrical contractor with thirty technicians that needs SWMS and test-and-tag certificates completed on the phone and attached to the job automaticallynot Zuper
- A plumbing business that wants live wholesaler pricing pulled into quotes so margins are not eroded by stale cost pricesnot Zuper
- A fire protection company running recurring statutory inspections against a register of customer assets across many sitesnot Zuper
- A New Zealand facilities maintenance firm that needs job costing to reconcile cleanly into Xero without a manual export stepnot Zuper
Zuper
- A service business whose customer records already live in Salesforce or HubSpot wants field execution underneath rather than a platform that insists on owning the customer.not AroFlo
- A solar or utility contractor needs work orders driven by an external asset or billing system through an API rather than entered by a dispatcher.not AroFlo
- A multi-location or franchise operation needs consistent job workflows and reporting across sites with an existing enterprise finance system to feed.not AroFlo
- A support organisation already running Zendesk or Freshdesk wants field visits raised from tickets and closed back into them without a middleware project.not AroFlo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AroFlo
- AroFlo, Simpro, BigChange and ClockShark now share one owner in Simpro Group, so a shortlist that compares them is comparing products with a single roadmap owner and no competitive pressure between them to keep prices down.
- No pricing is published at all, so you cannot size a budget before entering a sales process, and there is no public reference point to check whether the quote you are given is normal.
- The supplier catalogue feeds, compliance form library and accounting connectors are built for Australia and New Zealand, so contractors elsewhere pay for a product whose most differentiated features do not apply to their market.
- The interface carries a long history and the configuration surface is large, so getting the workflow, custom fields and forms right typically needs paid setup and several weeks before the field team stops working around it.
- Reporting is user-defined rather than dimensional, so multi-entity groups that want consolidated profitability across business units generally end up exporting to a spreadsheet or a separate BI tool.
Zuper
- Zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
- At the reported rates it costs several times a Jobber or Housecall Pro seat, which makes it hard to justify for a small contractor who will use a fraction of the configuration surface.
- The flexibility that makes it a good execution layer means it needs configuring: custom statuses, forms and workflow rules are strengths for a business with an operations analyst and a burden for one without.
- Accounting is integration-only and the finance depth is thin next to platforms with native ledgers, so complex tax, multi-entity or progress billing scenarios push work back into the ERP.
- It is a younger and smaller vendor than ServiceTitan or FieldEdge with a correspondingly thinner partner and implementation network, so if you need local implementation help outside the main markets you may be dealing directly with the vendor or doing it yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
AroFlo
On request- AroFlo Premium$undefined/month
- Quoting, job management and invoicing
- Timesheets and scheduling
- Compliance and safety forms
Zuper
On request- Starter$undefined/month
- Core work orders, scheduling and mobile app
- Standard integrations
- Priced per user on application
- Growth$undefined/month
- Adds inventory, job costing and advanced workflows
- Quoted on application
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom workflows, API access at scale and dedicated support
- Quoted on application, typically with an annual commitment
Which should you pick?
Choose AroFlo if
- You need mobile job cards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want supplier catalogue feeds.
Choose Zuper if
- You need work order management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intelligent dispatch.
Questions people ask
- Is AroFlo or Zuper better?
- Neither clearly leads. AroFlo starts at On request and Zuper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AroFlo or Zuper?
- AroFlo starts at On request and Zuper at On request.
- Does AroFlo or Zuper run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is AroFlo best used for?
- AroFlo is most often used for an australian electrical contractor with thirty technicians that needs swms and test-and-tag certificates completed on the phone and attached to the job automatically, a plumbing business that wants live wholesaler pricing pulled into quotes so margins are not eroded by stale cost prices, a fire protection company running recurring statutory inspections against a register of customer assets across many sites, a new zealand facilities maintenance firm that needs job costing to reconcile cleanly into xero without a manual export step. Of those, an australian electrical contractor with thirty technicians that needs swms and test-and-tag certificates completed on the phone and attached to the job automatically and a plumbing business that wants live wholesaler pricing pulled into quotes so margins are not eroded by stale cost prices are not what Zuper is typically brought in for.
- What can AroFlo do that Zuper cannot?
- AroFlo covers Mobile job cards, Supplier catalogue feeds, Compliance and safety forms, Scheduling and dispatch. Zuper covers Work order management, Intelligent dispatch, Technician mobile, Inventory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AroFlo: Is AroFlo still sold separately from Simpro?
Yes. Simpro Group has kept AroFlo, Simpro, BigChange and ClockShark as separate products with separate sales teams, though all four are under one owner.
Zuper: How much does Zuper cost?
It is not published. Independent reports put it roughly between 50 and 150 US dollars per user per month depending on tier and volume, usually on an annual commitment.
AroFlo: How much does AroFlo cost?
AroFlo does not publish prices. Expect a per-user monthly figure in AUD quoted after a discovery call, with setup and training charged on top.
Zuper: Can Zuper run under Salesforce or HubSpot?
Yes, that is one of its main positions. It integrates as a field execution layer rather than requiring you to move the customer record.
AroFlo: Can I use AroFlo outside Australia?
You can, but the wholesaler price feeds, compliance templates and accounting integrations are aimed at Australia and New Zealand, which removes much of the reason to choose it.
Zuper: Does it work offline?
The technician mobile app is built to capture work offline and sync when connectivity returns.
AroFlo: Does it work offline?
Yes. The mobile app stores job data locally and syncs when a connection returns, which matters for plant rooms and rural sites.
Zuper: Is Zuper suitable for a five person contractor?
Usually not on cost. At the reported per-seat rates, Jobber or Housecall Pro deliver the same day-to-day job flow far cheaper.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- AroFlo vs ServiceTitan
- AroFlo vs Skedulo
- AroFlo vs Jobber
- AroFlo vs Tradify
- AroFlo vs Joblogic
- AroFlo vs BigChange
- AroFlo vs Commusoft
- AroFlo vs Workiz
- AroFlo vs FieldEdge
- AroFlo vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- AroFlo vs FaciliWorks
- AroFlo vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- AroFlo vs Vonigo
- AroFlo vs Fracttal One
- AroFlo vs Housecall Pro
- AroFlo vs Synchroteam
- AroFlo vs MaintainX
- AroFlo vs Tractian
- AroFlo vs ResortCleaning
- Zuper vs ServiceTitan
- Zuper vs Skedulo
- Zuper vs Jobber
- Zuper vs Tradify
- Zuper vs Joblogic
- Zuper vs BigChange
- Zuper vs Commusoft
- Zuper vs Workiz
- Zuper vs FieldEdge
- Zuper vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Zuper vs FaciliWorks
- Zuper vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Zuper vs Vonigo
- Zuper vs Fracttal One
- Zuper vs Housecall Pro
- Zuper vs Synchroteam
- Zuper vs MaintainX
- Zuper vs Tractian
- Zuper vs ResortCleaning
