Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs MapTiler

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

MapTiler
Maps
Map hosting, styling, and APIs for developers with beautiful pre-built map styles
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; MapTiler the free tier is restricted to testing, personal or non commercial use and forces a MapTiler logo on the map
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, MapTiler covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and MapTiler actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in MapTiler
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot MapTiler
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot MapTiler
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot MapTiler
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot MapTiler
MapTiler
- Web and mobile mapping applicationsnot Atlas.co
- Vector tile and raster map hostingnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
MapTiler
- The free tier is restricted to testing, personal or non commercial use and forces a MapTiler logo on the map
- Free is capped at 5,000 map sessions, 1,000 search sessions and 100,000 API requests a month
- Free storage is 5 GB but limited to a single file
- The Flex plan at $30 a month bills overage at $2.50 per 1,000 sessions and $0.15 per 1,000 API requests
- Soft usage limits that prevent surprise overage bills are a Custom plan feature, so cheaper plans can run up charges
- A 99.9% SLA requires the prepaid Custom contract
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
MapTiler
Free- FreeFree
- 5 GB storage
- 1 file maximum
- 5,000 monthly sessions
- Flex$30/monthly
- 10 GB storage
- 25,000 monthly sessions
- 500,000 monthly API requests
- Custom$null/prepaid
- Custom storage and monthly sessions
- Custom API request limits
- 99.9 percent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose MapTiler if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or MapTiler better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and MapTiler at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or MapTiler?
- Atlas.co starts at Free and MapTiler at Free.
- Does Atlas.co or MapTiler run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what MapTiler is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that MapTiler cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. MapTiler covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
MapTiler: What happens if I exceed my session or API request limits on the Flex plan?
On the Flex plan, overage charges apply when you exceed limits. Sessions cost $2.50 per 1,000 over the monthly limit of 25,000. API requests cost $0.15 per 1,000 over the 500,000 monthly limit. Additional storage of 100 GB costs $20 per month.
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
MapTiler: Can I use the Free plan for commercial projects?
No, the Free plan is restricted to testing, personal, or non-commercial use only. Commercial use is only permitted on the Flex plan ($30/month) or Custom plans with prepaid volume contracts.
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
MapTiler: What is the difference between Flex and Custom plans?
The Flex plan costs $30 per month with preset limits and pay-as-you-go overages. Custom plans are negotiated per customer for high-traffic use cases and include 99.9 percent SLA, team account support, and prepaid volume contracts. All prices are in USD excluding VAT.
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps Platform
- Atlas.co vs Mapbox
- Atlas.co vs HERE Technologies
- Atlas.co vs Apple Maps
- Atlas.co vs Cesium ion
- Atlas.co vs Bing Maps
- Atlas.co vs OpenRouteService
- Atlas.co vs Stadia Maps
- Atlas.co vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Atlas.co vs Leaflet
- Atlas.co vs OSRM
- Atlas.co vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Atlas.co vs PositionStack
- Atlas.co vs Radar
- Atlas.co vs SAGA GIS
- MapTiler vs Esri ArcGIS
- MapTiler vs CARTO
- MapTiler vs QGIS
- MapTiler vs Felt
- MapTiler vs Correlator3D
- MapTiler vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- MapTiler vs Global Mapper
- MapTiler vs GRASS GIS
- MapTiler vs Fused
- MapTiler vs deck.gl
- MapTiler vs Ride with GPS
- MapTiler vs Kepler.gl
- MapTiler vs Foursquare Places API
- MapTiler vs Geoapify
- MapTiler vs Google Maps
- MapTiler vs Leica Infinity
- MapTiler vs Google Maps Platform
- MapTiler vs Mapbox
- MapTiler vs HERE Technologies
- MapTiler vs Apple Maps
- MapTiler vs Cesium ion
- MapTiler vs Bing Maps
- MapTiler vs OpenRouteService
- MapTiler vs Stadia Maps
- MapTiler vs TomTom Developer Portal
- MapTiler vs Leaflet
- MapTiler vs OSRM
- MapTiler vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- MapTiler vs PositionStack
- MapTiler vs Radar
- MapTiler vs SAGA GIS
