Marketing · head to head
Fathom Analytics vs Roxhill

Roxhill
Marketing
UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fathom Analytics there is no free tier, only a 7 day trial; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
- They diverge on capability: Fathom Analytics covers Page view tracking, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom Analytics and Roxhill actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fathom Analytics | Roxhill |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $14/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom Analytics
- Page view tracking
- Goal tracking
- Real-time analytics
- Referrer tracking
- Privacy-focused
- GDPR compliant
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
Only in Roxhill
- Journalist database
- Journalist profiles
- Media lists and distribution
- Media requests and alerts
- Media monitoring
- Bespoke newsletters
- Historical search
- Journalist Assistant
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom Analytics
- Privacy-focused web analytics without cookie bannersnot Roxhill
- A lightweight Google Analytics replacementnot Roxhill
- Tracking many sites from one accountnot Roxhill
- Long-term historical reporting while subscribednot Roxhill
Roxhill
- A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not Fathom Analytics
- An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not Fathom Analytics
- A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not Fathom Analytics
- A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not Fathom Analytics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom Analytics
- There is no free tier, only a 7 day trial
- Priced on pageviews, from $45 a month at the 500,000 pageview level
- Custom events count against the pageview allowance rather than being tracked separately
- Site allowances come in packs, with additional 50-site packs at $10 a month
- Data is retained forever only while the subscription is active
Roxhill
- The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
- Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
- At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
- Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
- Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
- Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
- Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom Analytics
$14/month- Starter$14/month
- Unlimited page views
- 1 site
- Real-time analytics
Roxhill
On request- Core$undefined/year
- 1 licence
- Standard database access
- Journalist Assistant
- Boutique$undefined/year
- 3 licences
- Adds press release distribution
- 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 5 licences
- 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
- Spokespeople platform
- Premium$undefined/year
- Everything in Enterprise
- Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
- Competitor share of voice
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom Analytics if
- You need page view tracking.
- You also want goal tracking.
Choose Roxhill if
- You need journalist database.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want journalist profiles.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom Analytics or Roxhill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom Analytics starts at $14/month and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom Analytics or Roxhill?
- Fathom Analytics starts at $14/month and Roxhill at On request.
- Does Fathom Analytics or Roxhill run on more platforms?
- Fathom Analytics runs on Web. Roxhill runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Fathom Analytics best used for?
- Fathom Analytics is most often used for privacy-focused web analytics without cookie banners, a lightweight google analytics replacement, tracking many sites from one account, long-term historical reporting while subscribed. Of those, privacy-focused web analytics without cookie banners and a lightweight google analytics replacement are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom Analytics do that Roxhill cannot?
- Fathom Analytics covers Page view tracking, Goal tracking, Real-time analytics, Referrer tracking. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Journalist profiles, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fathom Analytics: How much does Fathom Analytics cost?
Fathom's entry-level plan costs $45/month for up to 500,000 pageviews. Higher volume tiers exist (1M, 2M, 10M, 25M+ pageviews) with custom pricing. Yearly billing provides 2 months free.
SourceRoxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?
Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.
Fathom Analytics: Is there a free trial for Fathom Analytics?
Yes, Fathom offers a 7-day free trial. There is no free tier after the trial ends.
SourceRoxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?
No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.
Fathom Analytics: What happens if my pageviews exceed my plan limit?
Fathom handles usage overage graciously, only upgrading your plan after two consecutive months over your limit. There are no immediate overage charges.
SourceRoxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?
Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.
Fathom Analytics: Can I add extra sites to my Fathom plan?
Yes, extra sites cost $10/month per 50-site pack, or $100/year (which includes two months free). All plans include a minimum of 50 included sites.
SourceRoxhill: Can I buy monthly?
No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.
Fathom Analytics: Can I cancel Fathom without a long contract?
Yes, there are no contracts and cancellation is flexible. Fathom does not lock customers into agreements.
SourceRelated pages
More on Fathom Analytics
Other head to heads
- Fathom Analytics vs Umami
- Fathom Analytics vs Crazy Egg
- Fathom Analytics vs Ruler Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs VWO
- Fathom Analytics vs Northbeam
- Fathom Analytics vs Simple Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Freshpaint
- Fathom Analytics vs Matomo
- Fathom Analytics vs Plausible
- Fathom Analytics vs Attribution
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Fathom Analytics vs AB Tasty
- Fathom Analytics vs Dreamdata
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Optimize
- Fathom Analytics vs Onclusive
- Fathom Analytics vs Ahrefs
- Fathom Analytics vs CleverTap
- Fathom Analytics vs Invoca
- Fathom Analytics vs Optimove
- Fathom Analytics vs Swydo
- Fathom Analytics vs WebEngage
- Fathom Analytics vs Wunderkind
- Fathom Analytics vs Buffer
- Fathom Analytics vs Hootsuite
- Fathom Analytics vs Moz
- Fathom Analytics vs Improvado
- Fathom Analytics vs Insider
- Fathom Analytics vs Instapage
- Fathom Analytics vs June
- Roxhill vs Umami
- Roxhill vs Crazy Egg
- Roxhill vs Ruler Analytics
- Roxhill vs VWO
- Roxhill vs Northbeam
- Roxhill vs Simple Analytics
- Roxhill vs Freshpaint
- Roxhill vs Matomo
- Roxhill vs Plausible
- Roxhill vs Attribution
- Roxhill vs Google Analytics
- Roxhill vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Roxhill vs AB Tasty
- Roxhill vs Dreamdata
- Roxhill vs Google Optimize
- Roxhill vs Onclusive
- Roxhill vs Ahrefs
- Roxhill vs CleverTap
- Roxhill vs Invoca
- Roxhill vs Optimove
- Roxhill vs Swydo
- Roxhill vs WebEngage
- Roxhill vs Wunderkind
- Roxhill vs Buffer
- Roxhill vs Hootsuite
- Roxhill vs Moz
- Roxhill vs Improvado
- Roxhill vs Insider
- Roxhill vs Instapage
- Roxhill vs June

