Field Service · head to head
FaciliWorks vs Propel

FaciliWorks
Field Service
CMMS from CyberMetrics that still sells a perpetual on-premise licence alongside subscription
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaciliWorks the interface is dated by cloud CMMS standards, which matters most for occasional users such as production supervisors raising a request, who will need training that a modern mobile-first tool would not require.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: FaciliWorks covers Perpetual or subscription licensing, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaciliWorks and Propel actually diverge.
| Attribute | FaciliWorks | Propel |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android, On-premise | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API |
| Category | Field Service | Manufacturing |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaciliWorks
- Perpetual or subscription licensing
- Concurrent seat option
- Preventive maintenance scheduling
- Calibration alignment
- Parts and purchasing
- Mobile work orders
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaciliWorks
- A regulated manufacturer that must evidence both equipment maintenance and gauge calibration in one audit and wants both from one vendornot Propel
- A defence or utility site on an isolated network where a cloud-only CMMS is not permitted by policynot Propel
- A maintenance department that wants a capital purchase rather than a recurring subscription that grows with headcountnot Propel
- A plant with many occasional users where concurrent licensing costs far less than a named seat for every techniciannot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot FaciliWorks
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot FaciliWorks
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot FaciliWorks
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot FaciliWorks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaciliWorks
- The interface is dated by cloud CMMS standards, which matters most for occasional users such as production supervisors raising a request, who will need training that a modern mobile-first tool would not require.
- A perpetual licence still carries an annual maintenance and support fee, so the one-off purchase framing does not hold; without that fee you lose updates and support while keeping the right to run old code.
- Integration options are thin, with a limited API and few prebuilt connectors, so linking FaciliWorks to an ERP or a condition monitoring platform usually means custom database-level work.
- No pricing is published for any edition despite this being a mid-market product, so buyers cannot compare it against published per-user rivals without entering a sales process.
- CyberMetrics is a small independent vendor, which means responsive support but also a thin partner ecosystem and no realistic second-source implementation help if the relationship goes wrong.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
FaciliWorks
On request- FaciliWorks Essentials$undefined/year
- Core CMMS: assets, work orders, preventive maintenance
- Perpetual or subscription licensing
- Concurrent or node-locked seats
- FaciliWorks Pro$undefined/year
- Adds advanced reporting and analytics
- Parts inventory and purchasing
- Mobile access
- FaciliWorks Enterprise$undefined/year
- Multi-site and multi-currency
- All Pro capability
- Extended integration and administration options
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose FaciliWorks if
- You need perpetual or subscription licensing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android, On-premise.
- You also want concurrent seat option.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Questions people ask
- Is FaciliWorks or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaciliWorks starts at On request and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaciliWorks or Propel?
- FaciliWorks starts at On request and Propel at On request.
- Does FaciliWorks or Propel run on more platforms?
- FaciliWorks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android, On-premise. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- What is FaciliWorks best used for?
- FaciliWorks is most often used for a regulated manufacturer that must evidence both equipment maintenance and gauge calibration in one audit and wants both from one vendor, a defence or utility site on an isolated network where a cloud-only cmms is not permitted by policy, a maintenance department that wants a capital purchase rather than a recurring subscription that grows with headcount, a plant with many occasional users where concurrent licensing costs far less than a named seat for every technician. Of those, a regulated manufacturer that must evidence both equipment maintenance and gauge calibration in one audit and wants both from one vendor and a defence or utility site on an isolated network where a cloud-only cmms is not permitted by policy are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can FaciliWorks do that Propel cannot?
- FaciliWorks covers Perpetual or subscription licensing, Concurrent seat option, Preventive maintenance scheduling, Calibration alignment. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Quality management, Product information management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FaciliWorks: Can I still buy FaciliWorks outright?
Yes. Perpetual on-premise licensing is still offered alongside subscription, which is unusual in CMMS today.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
FaciliWorks: Does a perpetual licence mean no recurring cost?
No. Annual maintenance and support is a separate ongoing fee, and dropping it costs you updates and support.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
FaciliWorks: Is there concurrent licensing?
Yes. Concurrent seats let a large pool of occasional users share fewer licences, which is often cheaper than named seats.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
FaciliWorks: Is pricing published?
No. All editions are quoted, so you must engage sales to get a comparable number.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
More on FaciliWorks
Other head to heads
- FaciliWorks vs Tractian
- FaciliWorks vs MaintainX
- FaciliWorks vs Fracttal One
- FaciliWorks vs Redlist
- FaciliWorks vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- FaciliWorks vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- FaciliWorks vs Commusoft
- FaciliWorks vs Joblogic
- FaciliWorks vs Jobber
- FaciliWorks vs AroFlo
- FaciliWorks vs BigChange
- FaciliWorks vs FieldEdge
- FaciliWorks vs Percepto
- FaciliWorks vs Repsly
- FaciliWorks vs ResortCleaning
- FaciliWorks vs Arena PLM
- FaciliWorks vs Aras Innovator
- FaciliWorks vs OpenBOM
- FaciliWorks vs Materialise Magics
- FaciliWorks vs SolidWorks
- FaciliWorks vs AVEVA System Platform
- FaciliWorks vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- FaciliWorks vs Fusion 360
- FaciliWorks vs TrakSYS
- FaciliWorks vs Litmus Edge
- FaciliWorks vs Ignition
- FaciliWorks vs KCF Technologies
- FaciliWorks vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- FaciliWorks vs LabVIEW
- FaciliWorks vs SKF Enlight Centre
- FaciliWorks vs ABB 800xA
- FaciliWorks vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs Tractian
- Propel vs MaintainX
- Propel vs Fracttal One
- Propel vs Redlist
- Propel vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Propel vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Propel vs Commusoft
- Propel vs Joblogic
- Propel vs Jobber
- Propel vs AroFlo
- Propel vs BigChange
- Propel vs FieldEdge
- Propel vs Percepto
- Propel vs Repsly
- Propel vs ResortCleaning
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
