Manufacturing · head to head
ABB 800xA vs Propel

ABB 800xA
Manufacturing
Distributed control system and process automation platform for continuous and hybrid process plants
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ABB 800xA licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ABB 800xA and Propel actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ABB 800xA
- Extended Automation
- AC 800M controllers
- Connectivity servers
- Safety integration
- IEC 61850 electrical
- Batch management
- Information management
- Asset optimisation
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ABB 800xA
- A refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in placenot Propel
- A pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplacenot Propel
- A mining operation that needs SIL 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety systemnot Propel
- A marine or offshore platform where ABB already supplies the electrical distribution and IEC 61850 integration removes a second systemnot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot ABB 800xA
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot ABB 800xA
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot ABB 800xA
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot ABB 800xA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ABB 800xA
- Licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.
- Engineering and commissioning typically cost more than the software and controller hardware together, and that share is not visible in the initial ABB quotation, which prices the system rather than the project.
- It is Windows only for servers and workplaces, so the operating system lifecycle drives forced upgrade cycles that have nothing to do with your process.
- Once configured, the aspect object model and the specific integrator conventions used make handing the system to a different service provider expensive; ABB service contracts are effectively sticky.
- Software maintenance is an annual contract on top of the licence and lapsing it means you cannot take version upgrades, so the system quietly ages out of security support if the plant skips renewals to save money.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
ABB 800xA
On request- ABB Ability System 800xA$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients
- Sold as a project through ABB or a certified partner
- Annual software maintenance contract priced separately
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose ABB 800xA if
- You need extended automation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want ac 800m controllers.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Questions people ask
- Is ABB 800xA or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. ABB 800xA starts at On request and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ABB 800xA or Propel?
- ABB 800xA starts at On request and Propel at On request.
- Does ABB 800xA or Propel run on more platforms?
- ABB 800xA runs on Windows. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- What is ABB 800xA best used for?
- ABB 800xA is most often used for a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place, a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace, a mining operation that needs sil 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety system, a marine or offshore platform where abb already supplies the electrical distribution and iec 61850 integration removes a second system. Of those, a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place and a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can ABB 800xA do that Propel cannot?
- ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, AC 800M controllers, Connectivity servers, Safety integration. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Quality management, Product information management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ABB 800xA: Is 800xA sold as a perpetual licence?
Yes, the system licence is perpetual, but a separate annual software maintenance agreement is required to receive updates and version upgrades.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
ABB 800xA: Can 800xA control non-ABB field hardware?
Yes. Connectivity servers front third-party PLC and DCS systems and legacy ABB families, which is the main reason it wins brownfield projects.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
ABB 800xA: Does it replace a separate electrical SCADA?
It can. IEC 61850 substation integration is native, so many plants drop a separate electrical monitoring system.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
ABB 800xA: What is the realistic implementation timeline?
A full plant migration is measured in years, not months; phased cutovers of one unit at a time are the norm.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ABB 800xA vs AVEVA System Platform
- ABB 800xA vs Ignition
- ABB 800xA vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- ABB 800xA vs GENESIS Version 11
- ABB 800xA vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- ABB 800xA vs COPA-DATA zenon
- ABB 800xA vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- ABB 800xA vs Authentise
- ABB 800xA vs Kepware Server
- ABB 800xA vs QAD Redzone
- ABB 800xA vs Samotics
- ABB 800xA vs Sight Machine
- ABB 800xA vs Simplify3D
- ABB 800xA vs TrendMiner
- ABB 800xA vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Xometry
- ABB 800xA vs Arena PLM
- ABB 800xA vs Aras Innovator
- ABB 800xA vs OpenBOM
- ABB 800xA vs Materialise Magics
- ABB 800xA vs SolidWorks
- ABB 800xA vs Fusion 360
- ABB 800xA vs TrakSYS
- ABB 800xA vs Litmus Edge
- ABB 800xA vs KCF Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- ABB 800xA vs LabVIEW
- ABB 800xA vs SKF Enlight Centre
- ABB 800xA vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Propel vs GENESIS Version 11
- Propel vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Propel vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs Authentise
- Propel vs Kepware Server
- Propel vs QAD Redzone
- Propel vs Samotics
- Propel vs Sight Machine
- Propel vs Simplify3D
- Propel vs TrendMiner
- Propel vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Propel vs Xometry
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
