Software · head to head
Elastic APM vs Filebeat
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service; Filebeat filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
- They diverge on capability: Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Filebeat covers File tailing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic APM and Filebeat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Elastic APM | Filebeat |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2011).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic APM
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
- Custom metrics
Only in Filebeat
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
- Input harvesting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic APM
- Distributed tracing across microservicesnot Filebeat
- Auto-instrumenting Java, .NET, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, PHP and C++ servicesnot Filebeat
- OpenTelemetry-native collection through the Elastic distributionsnot Filebeat
- Correlating latency and errors with machine learningnot Filebeat
- Monitoring LLM calls alongside application tracesnot Filebeat
Filebeat
- Log monitoringnot Elastic APM
- Application performancenot Elastic APM
- Security analyticsnot Elastic APM
- Troubleshootingnot Elastic APM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic APM
- Pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
- Self-managed deployment means running and scaling Elasticsearch yourself
- Serverless does not carry every capability the hosted option does
Filebeat
- Filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic APM
Free- FreeFree
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
Filebeat
Free- FreeFree
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic APM if
- You need performance monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want error tracking.
Choose Filebeat if
- You need file tailing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log forwarding.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic APM or Filebeat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic APM starts at Free and Filebeat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic APM or Filebeat?
- Elastic APM starts at Free and Filebeat at Free.
- Does Elastic APM or Filebeat run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Elastic APM for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Elastic APM best used for?
- Elastic APM is most often used for distributed tracing across microservices, auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services, opentelemetry-native collection through the elastic distributions, correlating latency and errors with machine learning. Of those, distributed tracing across microservices and auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services are not what Filebeat is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic APM do that Filebeat cannot?
- Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Error tracking, Transaction tracing, Custom metrics. Filebeat covers File tailing, Log forwarding, Event parsing, Input harvesting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Elastic APM
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Elastic APM vs Elastic Stack
- Elastic APM vs New Relic
- Elastic APM vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic APM vs Coralogix
- Elastic APM vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic APM vs CloudWatch
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace
- Elastic APM vs InfluxDB
- Elastic APM vs Airbrake
- Elastic APM vs AppDynamics
- Elastic APM vs Axiom
- Elastic APM vs Azure Monitor
- Elastic APM vs Better Stack
- Elastic APM vs Bugsnag
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic APM vs Elastic
- Elastic APM vs Elasticsearch Service
- Elastic APM vs ELK Stack
- Filebeat vs Elastic Stack
- Filebeat vs New Relic
- Filebeat vs Datadog Logs
- Filebeat vs Coralogix
- Filebeat vs Grafana Loki
- Filebeat vs CloudWatch
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace
- Filebeat vs InfluxDB
- Filebeat vs Airbrake
- Filebeat vs AppDynamics
- Filebeat vs Axiom
- Filebeat vs Azure Monitor
- Filebeat vs Better Stack
- Filebeat vs Bugsnag
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace Logs
- Filebeat vs Elastic
- Filebeat vs Elasticsearch Service
- Filebeat vs ELK Stack


