Maps · head to head
deck.gl vs Fleet Complete

deck.gl
Maps
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Fleet Complete
Fleet Management
Telematics and asset tracking sold mainly through mobile network operators
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only deck.gl has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: deck.gl open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues; Fleet Complete because most contracts are sold through a carrier, the commercial relationship, the service levels and the renewal date belong to the carrier, so a pricing dispute or a support escalation goes through a reseller who did not build the software.
- They diverge on capability: deck.gl covers Core Functionality, Fleet Complete covers Vehicle tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which deck.gl and Fleet Complete actually diverge.
| Attribute | deck.gl | Fleet Complete |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | open-source | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in deck.gl
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Fleet Complete
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Asset trackers
- Field dispatch
- Dashcams
- Maintenance reminders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot Fleet Complete
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot Fleet Complete
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot Fleet Complete
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot Fleet Complete
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot Fleet Complete
Fleet Complete
- A mid-size fleet already under a national carrier contract that wants tracking added to an existing telecoms agreement rather than a new vendor relationshipnot deck.gl
- Mixed fleets that need to track unpowered assets such as trailers and generators alongside vehicles in one consolenot deck.gl
- Canadian operators wanting a domestic vendor with local support and Telus channel billingnot deck.gl
- Service businesses that want basic dispatch and vehicle tracking without buying a separate field service platformnot deck.gl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
deck.gl
- Open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues
- Maintained by community contributors (vis.gl contributors), not by a dedicated company support team
Fleet Complete
- Because most contracts are sold through a carrier, the commercial relationship, the service levels and the renewal date belong to the carrier, so a pricing dispute or a support escalation goes through a reseller who did not build the software.
- Hardware is bundled into the subscription over a multi-year term, so a fleet that shrinks mid-contract keeps paying for units that are sitting in a store cupboard unless it negotiated a downsizing clause up front.
- The product line was assembled by acquisition, so hours of service, European tracking and the core platform originated as separate products, leaving overlapping apps, duplicate logins and features that exist in one region but not another.
- The third-party integration ecosystem is far smaller than the marketplaces run by Geotab or Samsara, so bespoke connections to a maintenance or payroll system usually mean building against the API yourself.
- The web console and reporting look and behave like software designed a decade ago, and administrators who have used a newer platform will find the reporting builder slow and the exports rigid.
Pricing, plan by plan
deck.gl
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
Fleet Complete
On request- Fleet Complete$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription, hardware included
- Term length usually tied to the reselling carrier agreement
- Asset trackers priced separately from vehicle units
Which should you pick?
Choose deck.gl if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Fleet Complete if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Questions people ask
- Is deck.gl or Fleet Complete better?
- Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at Free and Fleet Complete at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, deck.gl or Fleet Complete?
- deck.gl has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for deck.gl and On request for Fleet Complete.
- Does deck.gl or Fleet Complete run on more platforms?
- deck.gl runs on Web. Fleet Complete runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use deck.gl for free?
- Yes. deck.gl has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fleet Complete starts at On request.
- What is deck.gl best used for?
- deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what Fleet Complete is typically brought in for.
- What can deck.gl do that Fleet Complete cannot?
- deck.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Fleet Complete covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Asset trackers, Field dispatch.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
deck.gl: How much does deck.gl cost?
deck.gl is completely free to use. It is an open source framework maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and community contributors. The project is available on GitHub for anyone to use, modify, and contribute to without cost.
SourceFleet Complete: Do I buy Fleet Complete directly or through my mobile operator?
Both are possible, but the majority of North American customers buy through AT&T or Telus. Check which entity the contract is with, because it determines your support path, your billing cycle and your renewal date.
deck.gl: Is deck.gl open source?
Yes, deck.gl is open source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and vis.gl contributors. The source code is publicly available, and the framework can be used freely in any project.
SourceFleet Complete: What happens to the hardware if I cancel?
Devices supplied as part of a subsidised subscription are normally recovered or charged for on early termination. Ask for the exact clause before signing, because it is where the real cost of leaving sits.
Fleet Complete: Is it a fit for a fleet of five vans?
It will work, but small fleets get a better deal from vendors that publish pricing and sell month to month. Fleet Complete pricing improves with volume and a carrier relationship.
Related pages
More on Fleet Complete
Other head to heads
- deck.gl vs Lonboard
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs HERE Technologies
- deck.gl vs Fused
- deck.gl vs Kepler.gl
- deck.gl vs Potree
- deck.gl vs QGIS
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs Cesium ion
- deck.gl vs Trailforks
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
- deck.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
- deck.gl vs Samsara
- deck.gl vs Geotab
- deck.gl vs Verizon Connect
- deck.gl vs Motive
- deck.gl vs CalAmp
- deck.gl vs Webfleet
- deck.gl vs Zonar Systems
- deck.gl vs Lytx
- deck.gl vs NexTraq
- deck.gl vs Uptake
- deck.gl vs AssetWorks
- deck.gl vs Chevin FleetWave
- deck.gl vs Quartix
- deck.gl vs Ridecell
- deck.gl vs Whip Around
- Fleet Complete vs Lonboard
- Fleet Complete vs Apple Maps
- Fleet Complete vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Fleet Complete vs Mapbox
- Fleet Complete vs Google Maps Platform
- Fleet Complete vs HERE Technologies
- Fleet Complete vs Fused
- Fleet Complete vs Kepler.gl
- Fleet Complete vs Potree
- Fleet Complete vs QGIS
- Fleet Complete vs Esri ArcGIS
- Fleet Complete vs Cesium ion
- Fleet Complete vs Trailforks
- Fleet Complete vs AllTrails
- Fleet Complete vs Bing Maps
- Fleet Complete vs Citymapper
- Fleet Complete vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Fleet Complete vs Samsara
- Fleet Complete vs Geotab
- Fleet Complete vs Verizon Connect
- Fleet Complete vs Motive
- Fleet Complete vs CalAmp
- Fleet Complete vs Webfleet
- Fleet Complete vs Zonar Systems
- Fleet Complete vs Lytx
- Fleet Complete vs NexTraq
- Fleet Complete vs Uptake
- Fleet Complete vs AssetWorks
- Fleet Complete vs Chevin FleetWave
- Fleet Complete vs Quartix
- Fleet Complete vs Ridecell
- Fleet Complete vs Whip Around
