Softwr

Maps · alternatives

Alternatives to deck.gl

24 maps tools sit alongside deck.gl in this directory. Below is what separates each from deck.gl on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.

Alternatives listed
24
With a free tier
15
Cheaper to start
-
deck.gl starts at
Free

Why people look past deck.gl

Nothing on the record flags a reason to move. deck.gl has a free tier. People still switch over fit and workflow, and those are not things a catalogue entry can measure, which is what the comparisons below are for.

What each alternative does differently

Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.

Free, then $100/month

Comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to embed Google

  • Publishes an entry price of $100/month, where deck.gl does not.
  • Sold on a subscription model rather than open-source.
Free

Location data platform for mobile and web applications

  • Publishes an entry price of Free, where deck.gl does not.

Location data and technology company that provides mapping and location services to businesses globally

  • Publishes an entry price of Free, where deck.gl does not.

Web mapping and navigation application developed by Apple Inc

  • Sold on a freemium model rather than open-source.
Free, then $20/month

Serverless Python for geospatial: write a UDF, get a map tile endpoint and an HTTP API

  • Publishes an entry price of $20/month, where deck.gl does not.
  • Sold on a Per month by compute tier model rather than open-source.

Long-running open source geospatial analysis engine for raster, vector and terrain processing

  • Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than open-source.

Every deck.gl alternative at a glance

A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.

Maps alternatives to deck.gl
ToolEntry priceModelTiersHead to head
deck.gl (this page)FreeOpen-source-
Google Maps PlatformComprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to embed GoogleFree, then $100/monthSubscription4vs deck.gl
MapboxLocation data platform for mobile and web applicationsFree--vs deck.gl
HERE TechnologiesLocation data and technology company that provides mapping and location services to businesses globallyFree--vs deck.gl
Apple MapsWeb mapping and navigation application developed by Apple IncFreeFreemium-vs deck.gl
FusedFree, then $20/monthPer month by compute tier4vs deck.gl
GRASS GISFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs deck.gl
Cesium ionFree, then $149/monthPer month by storage, streaming and gigapixels4vs deck.gl
Google MapsFreeFree consumer app, funded by Google's advertising business1vs deck.gl
FeltFreeQuote3vs deck.gl
PotreeFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs deck.gl
Emlid StudioFreeFree of charge, no licence fee1vs deck.gl
Atlas.coFree, then $23/monthPer user per month4vs deck.gl
LonboardFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs deck.gl
SAGA GISFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs deck.gl
Ride with GPSFreeFreemium, per user per month3vs deck.gl
ArcGIS Survey123On requestPer user per year by ArcGIS user type3vs deck.gl
Foursquare Spatial StudioOn requestQuote1vs deck.gl
Correlator3D$295/monthOne-time purchase5vs deck.gl
Leica InfinityOn requestQuote2vs deck.gl
Global Mapper$700/one-timeOne-time purchase4vs deck.gl
onX MapsOn requestSeparate per-product subscriptions, per user per year4vs deck.gl
Geographic CalculatorOn requestQuote3vs deck.gl
Agisoft Metashape$179/one-timeOne-time purchase3vs deck.gl
ArcGIS Field MapsOn requestIncluded with an ArcGIS user type licence3vs deck.gl

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the deck.gl badges page.

Cheaper ways to solve the same problem

Free to start (15)

These publish a tier that costs nothing, so they can be evaluated before any money changes hands.

What you would be giving up

deck.gl is most often brought in for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation, use from react or plain javascript. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.

Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.

If deck.gl is broadly right and the question is cost, the deck.gl pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the Maps category lists everything the directory holds, and best maps tools ranks them.

deck.gl runs on web. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.

Questions about deck.gl alternatives

What are the main alternatives to deck.gl?
24 other maps tools are listed in this directory, led by Google Maps Platform, Mapbox, HERE Technologies, Apple Maps. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
What is the best free alternative to deck.gl?
15 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: Google Maps Platform, Mapbox, HERE Technologies, Apple Maps, Fused.
Is there a reason to switch away from deck.gl?
Nothing in the data flags one. deck.gl has a free tier. Fit and workflow are the usual reasons to move, and those are not things this record can measure.
What would I give up by switching from deck.gl?
deck.gl is most often brought in for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation, use from react or plain javascript. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
Is there an open-source alternative to deck.gl?
None of the maps tools listed here are recorded as open source. That is what the licence field on each entry says, and the field is not always filled in, so it is worth checking directly for any tool you are serious about.
How were these deck.gl alternatives chosen?
They are the tools filed in the same category, Maps, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
Where can I compare deck.gl against one of these directly?
Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against deck.gl covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
Does this list cover every maps tool?
No. It covers what this directory holds in the Maps category, 24 tools beside deck.gl. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.

Related pages