Softwr

Software · head to head

deck.gl vs Kepler.gl

deck.gl logo

deck.gl

Software

WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by

From
On request
Rated
-
Kepler.gl logo

Kepler.gl

Software

Powerful open-source geospatial analysis tool for large-scale datasets, enabling beautiful data visualizations without coding

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: deck.gl deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.; Kepler.gl kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which deck.gl and Kepler.gl actually diverge.

Attributes where deck.gl and Kepler.gl differ
Attributedeck.glKepler.gl

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in deck.gl

Nothing recorded that Kepler.gl does not also cover.

Only in Kepler.gl

Nothing recorded that deck.gl does not also cover.

Both cover

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

deck.gl

  • GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot Kepler.gl
  • Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot Kepler.gl
  • Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot Kepler.gl
  • High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot Kepler.gl
  • Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot Kepler.gl

Kepler.gl

No use cases recorded yet. See the Kepler.gl review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

deck.gl

  • deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.

Kepler.gl

  • Kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.

Pricing, plan by plan

deck.gl

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.

Kepler.gl

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Kepler.gl review.

Which should you pick?

Choose deck.gl if

Nothing in the data separates deck.gl from Kepler.gl on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose Kepler.gl if

Nothing in the data separates Kepler.gl from deck.gl on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Questions people ask

Is deck.gl or Kepler.gl better?
Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at On request and Kepler.gl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, deck.gl or Kepler.gl?
deck.gl starts at On request and Kepler.gl at On request.
Does deck.gl or Kepler.gl run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is deck.gl best used for?
deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what Kepler.gl is typically brought in for.

Related pages

Other head to heads