Fleet Management · head to head
Chevin FleetWave vs deck.gl

Chevin FleetWave
Fleet Management
Fleet management system covering vehicles and equipment assets, sold in three tiers from FleetWave Lite at £3 per vehicle per month upward
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

deck.gl
Maps
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only deck.gl has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chevin FleetWave only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.; deck.gl open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues
- They diverge on capability: Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, deck.gl covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chevin FleetWave and deck.gl actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chevin FleetWave | deck.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per vehicle per month (Lite); quote for Core and Advanced | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chevin FleetWave
- Maintenance scheduling
- Compliance tracking
- Fuel management
- Total cost of ownership reporting
- Multi-asset tracking
- Accident and incident recording
Only in deck.gl
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chevin FleetWave
- A smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance trackingnot deck.gl
- A mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate toolsnot deck.gl
- An operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset typenot deck.gl
- A fleet outgrowing FleetWave Lite and needing Core or Advanced tier compliance and reporting depthnot deck.gl
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot Chevin FleetWave
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot Chevin FleetWave
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot Chevin FleetWave
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot Chevin FleetWave
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot Chevin FleetWave
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chevin FleetWave
- Only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.
- Pricing is in GBP by default, reflecting Chevin UK base, which adds currency conversion uncertainty for buyers budgeting in other currencies before a formal quote.
- The Lite tier is explicitly a simpler feature set, so a fleet that starts there and later needs compliance depth or multi-asset TCO reporting faces a tier upgrade and a new, unpublished price negotiation.
- As a UK-headquartered vendor, integration depth with US-centric telematics and fuel card providers may be less mature than with UK and European partners.
- Equipment and asset pricing at $0.50 per asset is a separate line item from the vehicle rate, so a mixed vehicle-and-equipment fleet needs to calculate two different per-unit costs to budget accurately.
deck.gl
- Open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues
- Maintained by community contributors (vis.gl contributors), not by a dedicated company support team
Pricing, plan by plan
Chevin FleetWave
On request- FleetWave Lite$undefined/month
- £3 per vehicle per month
- Equipment and associated assets $0.50 per asset
- Simpler feature set aimed at smaller or less complex fleets
- FleetWave Core / Advanced$undefined/year
- No published pricing, consultation required
- Expanded compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting features
deck.gl
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Chevin FleetWave if
- You need maintenance scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want compliance tracking.
Choose deck.gl if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Chevin FleetWave or deck.gl better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chevin FleetWave starts at On request and deck.gl at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chevin FleetWave or deck.gl?
- deck.gl has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Chevin FleetWave and Free for deck.gl.
- Does Chevin FleetWave or deck.gl run on more platforms?
- Chevin FleetWave runs on Web, iOS, Android. deck.gl runs on Web.
- Can I use deck.gl for free?
- Yes. deck.gl has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Chevin FleetWave starts at On request.
- What is Chevin FleetWave best used for?
- Chevin FleetWave is most often used for a smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance tracking, a mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate tools, an operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset type, a fleet outgrowing fleetwave lite and needing core or advanced tier compliance and reporting depth. Of those, a smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance tracking and a mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate tools are not what deck.gl is typically brought in for.
- What can Chevin FleetWave do that deck.gl cannot?
- Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, Compliance tracking, Fuel management, Total cost of ownership reporting. deck.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chevin FleetWave: Is FleetWave pricing public?
Only for the Lite tier, at £3 per vehicle per month plus $0.50 per equipment asset. Core and Advanced tiers require a consultation.
deck.gl: How much does deck.gl cost?
deck.gl is completely free to use. It is an open source framework maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and community contributors. The project is available on GitHub for anyone to use, modify, and contribute to without cost.
SourceChevin FleetWave: What is the difference between Lite, Core and Advanced?
Lite is a simpler feature set for smaller or less complex fleets; Core and Advanced add compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting depth, priced separately.
deck.gl: Is deck.gl open source?
Yes, deck.gl is open source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and vis.gl contributors. The source code is publicly available, and the framework can be used freely in any project.
SourceChevin FleetWave: Does it track non-vehicle equipment?
Yes, equipment and associated assets are tracked within the same platform, priced separately from vehicles.
Related pages
More on Chevin FleetWave
Other head to heads
- Chevin FleetWave vs Samsara
- Chevin FleetWave vs AssetWorks
- Chevin FleetWave vs Geotab
- Chevin FleetWave vs Verizon Connect
- Chevin FleetWave vs Azuga
- Chevin FleetWave vs Omnitracs
- Chevin FleetWave vs Whip Around
- Chevin FleetWave vs Fleet Complete
- Chevin FleetWave vs CalAmp
- Chevin FleetWave vs Uptake
- Chevin FleetWave vs Motive
- Chevin FleetWave vs Route4Me
- Chevin FleetWave vs Lytx
- Chevin FleetWave vs NexTraq
- Chevin FleetWave vs Quartix
- Chevin FleetWave vs Ridecell
- Chevin FleetWave vs Webfleet
- Chevin FleetWave vs Lonboard
- Chevin FleetWave vs Apple Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Chevin FleetWave vs Mapbox
- Chevin FleetWave vs Google Maps Platform
- Chevin FleetWave vs HERE Technologies
- Chevin FleetWave vs Fused
- Chevin FleetWave vs Kepler.gl
- Chevin FleetWave vs Potree
- Chevin FleetWave vs QGIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Esri ArcGIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Cesium ion
- Chevin FleetWave vs Trailforks
- Chevin FleetWave vs AllTrails
- Chevin FleetWave vs Bing Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Citymapper
- Chevin FleetWave vs ArcGIS Survey123
- deck.gl vs Samsara
- deck.gl vs AssetWorks
- deck.gl vs Geotab
- deck.gl vs Verizon Connect
- deck.gl vs Azuga
- deck.gl vs Omnitracs
- deck.gl vs Whip Around
- deck.gl vs Fleet Complete
- deck.gl vs CalAmp
- deck.gl vs Uptake
- deck.gl vs Motive
- deck.gl vs Route4Me
- deck.gl vs Lytx
- deck.gl vs NexTraq
- deck.gl vs Quartix
- deck.gl vs Ridecell
- deck.gl vs Webfleet
- deck.gl vs Lonboard
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs HERE Technologies
- deck.gl vs Fused
- deck.gl vs Kepler.gl
- deck.gl vs Potree
- deck.gl vs QGIS
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs Cesium ion
- deck.gl vs Trailforks
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
- deck.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
