Softwr

Maps & Navigation · head to head

deck.gl vs HERE Technologies

deck.gl logo

deck.gl

Maps & Navigation

WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by

From
On request
Rated
-
HERE Technologies logo

HERE Technologies

Maps & Navigation

Location data and technology company that provides mapping and location services to businesses globally

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only HERE Technologies has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: deck.gl deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.; HERE Technologies pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which deck.gl and HERE Technologies actually diverge.

Attributes where deck.gl and HERE Technologies differ
Attributedeck.glHERE Technologies
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelfreemiumUnknown
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android, Cross-platform
FoundedUnknown1985

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps & Navigation).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in deck.gl

Nothing recorded that HERE Technologies does not also cover.

Only in HERE Technologies

Nothing recorded that deck.gl does not also cover.

Both cover

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

deck.gl

  • GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot HERE Technologies
  • Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot HERE Technologies
  • Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot HERE Technologies
  • High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot HERE Technologies
  • Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot HERE Technologies

HERE Technologies

  • Map data for automated and assisted drivingnot deck.gl
  • Connected driving, including hazard alerts and road surface analysisnot deck.gl
  • Supply chain planning and logistics digital twinsnot deck.gl
  • Geocoding, search and map rendering through hosted location servicesnot deck.gl
  • Fleet tour planning and routing across 200 countriesnot deck.gl

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

deck.gl

  • deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.

HERE Technologies

  • Pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
  • Lack of transparency in cost projections makes budgeting and forecasting difficult
  • Requires separate API keys and subscriptions for different feature categories, complicating integration
  • Customer support quality and responsiveness is inconsistent compared to competitors like Google Maps

Pricing, plan by plan

deck.gl

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.

HERE Technologies

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the HERE Technologies review.

Which should you pick?

Choose deck.gl if

Nothing in the data separates deck.gl from HERE Technologies on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose HERE Technologies if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.

Questions people ask

Is deck.gl or HERE Technologies better?
Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at On request and HERE Technologies at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, deck.gl or HERE Technologies?
HERE Technologies has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for deck.gl and Free for HERE Technologies.
Does deck.gl or HERE Technologies run on more platforms?
deck.gl runs on Web. HERE Technologies runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
Can I use HERE Technologies for free?
Yes. HERE Technologies has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. deck.gl starts at On request.
What is deck.gl best used for?
deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what HERE Technologies is typically brought in for.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

HERE Technologies: What does HERE Technologies provide?

HERE Technologies provides a comprehensive location platform including digital maps, routing and navigation APIs, geocoding, search, traffic, positioning, and telematics services for automotive, logistics, and enterprise applications.

Source
HERE Technologies: Does HERE offer a free tier?

Yes. HERE provides a free tier with 30,000 map requests per month, 5,000 routing transactions, and 30,000 geocoding transactions. Usage beyond these limits is charged on a pay-as-you-go basis.

Source
HERE Technologies: What SDKs and APIs does HERE offer?

HERE provides REST APIs for maps, routing, geocoding, and search, plus SDKs for Android, iOS, Flutter, and JavaScript. The HERE SDK enables turn-by-turn navigation and location services for mobile and web applications.

Source
HERE Technologies: Is HERE's pricing transparent?

No. HERE uses a complex transaction-based pricing model with separate costs for different API categories. The pricing structure lacks transparency, making it difficult for customers to forecast costs at scale.

Source
HERE Technologies: How has HERE's pricing changed?

HERE moved to a simplified transaction-based pricing model with free monthly allowances for common APIs. Users pay per transaction beyond the free tier, though the structure has been criticized for complexity and lack of cost transparency.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads