Maps · head to head
deck.gl vs HERE Technologies

deck.gl
Maps
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

HERE Technologies
Maps
Location data and technology company that provides mapping and location services to businesses globally
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: deck.gl open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues; HERE Technologies pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which deck.gl and HERE Technologies actually diverge.
| Attribute | deck.gl | HERE Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform |
| Founded | Unknown | 1985 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in deck.gl
Nothing recorded that HERE Technologies does not also cover.
Only in HERE Technologies
Nothing recorded that deck.gl does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot HERE Technologies
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot HERE Technologies
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot HERE Technologies
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot HERE Technologies
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot HERE Technologies
HERE Technologies
- Map data for automated and assisted drivingnot deck.gl
- Connected driving, including hazard alerts and road surface analysisnot deck.gl
- Supply chain planning and logistics digital twinsnot deck.gl
- Geocoding, search and map rendering through hosted location servicesnot deck.gl
- Fleet tour planning and routing across 200 countriesnot deck.gl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
deck.gl
- Open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues
- Maintained by community contributors (vis.gl contributors), not by a dedicated company support team
HERE Technologies
- Pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
- Lack of transparency in cost projections makes budgeting and forecasting difficult
- Requires separate API keys and subscriptions for different feature categories, complicating integration
- Customer support quality and responsiveness is inconsistent compared to competitors like Google Maps
Pricing, plan by plan
deck.gl
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
HERE Technologies
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the HERE Technologies review.
Which should you pick?
Choose HERE Technologies if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
Questions people ask
- Is deck.gl or HERE Technologies better?
- Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at Free and HERE Technologies at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, deck.gl or HERE Technologies?
- deck.gl starts at Free and HERE Technologies at Free.
- Does deck.gl or HERE Technologies run on more platforms?
- deck.gl runs on Web. HERE Technologies runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
- Can I use deck.gl for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is deck.gl best used for?
- deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what HERE Technologies is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
deck.gl: How much does deck.gl cost?
deck.gl is completely free to use. It is an open source framework maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and community contributors. The project is available on GitHub for anyone to use, modify, and contribute to without cost.
SourceHERE Technologies: What does HERE Technologies provide?
HERE Technologies provides a comprehensive location platform including digital maps, routing and navigation APIs, geocoding, search, traffic, positioning, and telematics services for automotive, logistics, and enterprise applications.
Sourcedeck.gl: Is deck.gl open source?
Yes, deck.gl is open source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and vis.gl contributors. The source code is publicly available, and the framework can be used freely in any project.
SourceHERE Technologies: Does HERE offer a free tier?
Yes. HERE provides a free tier with 30,000 map requests per month, 5,000 routing transactions, and 30,000 geocoding transactions. Usage beyond these limits is charged on a pay-as-you-go basis.
SourceHERE Technologies: What SDKs and APIs does HERE offer?
HERE provides REST APIs for maps, routing, geocoding, and search, plus SDKs for Android, iOS, Flutter, and JavaScript. The HERE SDK enables turn-by-turn navigation and location services for mobile and web applications.
SourceHERE Technologies: Is HERE's pricing transparent?
No. HERE uses a complex transaction-based pricing model with separate costs for different API categories. The pricing structure lacks transparency, making it difficult for customers to forecast costs at scale.
SourceHERE Technologies: How has HERE's pricing changed?
HERE moved to a simplified transaction-based pricing model with free monthly allowances for common APIs. Users pay per transaction beyond the free tier, though the structure has been criticized for complexity and lack of cost transparency.
SourceRelated pages
More on HERE Technologies
Other head to heads
- deck.gl vs Lonboard
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs Fused
- deck.gl vs Kepler.gl
- deck.gl vs Potree
- deck.gl vs QGIS
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs Cesium ion
- deck.gl vs Trailforks
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
- deck.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
- deck.gl vs LocationIQ
- deck.gl vs Mapzen
- deck.gl vs OsmAnd
- deck.gl vs TomTom Developer Portal
- deck.gl vs CARTO
- deck.gl vs Gaia GPS
- deck.gl vs onX Maps
- deck.gl vs SW Maps
- deck.gl vs WhiteboxTools
- deck.gl vs Agisoft Metashape
- deck.gl vs Atlas.co
- HERE Technologies vs Lonboard
- HERE Technologies vs Apple Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- HERE Technologies vs Mapbox
- HERE Technologies vs Google Maps Platform
- HERE Technologies vs Fused
- HERE Technologies vs Kepler.gl
- HERE Technologies vs Potree
- HERE Technologies vs QGIS
- HERE Technologies vs Esri ArcGIS
- HERE Technologies vs Cesium ion
- HERE Technologies vs Trailforks
- HERE Technologies vs AllTrails
- HERE Technologies vs Bing Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Citymapper
- HERE Technologies vs ArcGIS Survey123
- HERE Technologies vs LocationIQ
- HERE Technologies vs Mapzen
- HERE Technologies vs OsmAnd
- HERE Technologies vs TomTom Developer Portal
- HERE Technologies vs CARTO
- HERE Technologies vs Gaia GPS
- HERE Technologies vs onX Maps
- HERE Technologies vs SW Maps
- HERE Technologies vs WhiteboxTools
- HERE Technologies vs Agisoft Metashape
- HERE Technologies vs Atlas.co
